Re: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-13: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 May 2019 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAD7120243; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_BxoudBf66b; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B749C1201E9; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id f20so4679319edt.12; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UBKclc3uyE/xqktDG+zMKYxLxpu1InxxsEDPQavqYN0=; b=Nb3AEMcim37o1lCWRVT5WkOcxBwLvDa/N/F2fiaaxh+UZIj5fw7SNppNQqWoaRJiLd h/m157yNuXWTV57H2tKCnrRtav2Yc9wXL2T/5ZA+mDNSdzKueaxYU1gDfWQPRbUtEUM7 Vpvr7nFSmZ0vOebWGMn+hpzBV4nptHTMu4GKCsikqGCEtWAngs4uQ2J+h7SOnz1vF9ZA Nj00bbbfTw5OWUeRc7lS4PPckiqUBIIPM/mg9JDrMVK4Vo0PX+cAjxdJP5pkH2W+17KV G7IPKxVGlE6ZQfqWMuf/bjjnJzwuxeI+Bf+w/HDF2yLyRF3O7COZFZR0QWhw3TVGw3n6 Ps6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UBKclc3uyE/xqktDG+zMKYxLxpu1InxxsEDPQavqYN0=; b=EA/4jm5npVSQWQlr66OM+VpC81oMFQPGd1NrPAO3xWKCxBqLc6BgzbTrB02u2FLuIN EDqT11JdvKwsxMt3vw7Qqfdjta0YdFmWsV0nCAWTFezXI2H/V2ESbTCLsgiT9+rBTxsb 9pIamTCu/DcowAo4as4mUkjG96MuTfFUnZUME8cZ446hCdMRmLQPNqXbFgBOm4WfHvLV 7iB3yeWL87wAsdGHE8rwcwpqbIP1fflODEkQUTBAC2uWnKv/KLL25D8qW9Lt1DesHkcn SaNiGDPQB1bSWWMvwITdPWaO1LdB/nW0yoMhNBX46cQB0KKxBWPTLvkU0ol+9cCTU6d/ R4BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW4FiayT1llaMTdj6KCEsZJqPBI988hpEIbvbMjV93rOZLkS65x 8Sqym5FtsVfTqRMud8NHk637F87FH1pCoKEtWbg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxHfmjhxSyYqIj4r+YX8swMMibLm+bTLH0XFEU55xI7iS6L9YeCQmwuN/kClcy4ZMa85+8kSF/1HeIVJXtxsc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:22d8:: with SMTP id q24mr107227455eja.261.1559147889428; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 29 May 2019 12:38:09 -0400
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <155913814501.5477.15583573702686809097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <155913814501.5477.15583573702686809097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 12:38:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw3R_3dPs1U5C1J5+d3AnwtCLz+LESaViZBg3KT+_eWSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang@ietf.org
Cc: pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001a10ea058a09684b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/-rVGoLoikEqJZ8ozHHErj59CgPY>
Subject: Re: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:38:18 -0000
On May 29, 2019 at 9:55:46 AM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker ( noreply@ietf.org) wrote: Hi! Just responding to this specific issue: ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 3569 The reference to rfc3569 was added from a LC comment to define SSM in the terminology. The correct Normative reference is rfc4607 (Source-Specific Multicast for IP) and not rfc3569 (An Overview of Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)). rfc4607 is already a Normative reference in the document. Authors: in the next revision, please make the rfc3569 reference Informative. Thanks! Alvaro.
- [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Xufeng Liu