IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Status of advancing 3376/3810 to full standard

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 13 July 2022 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E43DC14CF06 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=innovationslab-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ov2MDodIdfso for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C751C14CF04 for <pim@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id g9so5581035qvq.7 for <pim@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=innovationslab-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:content-language:to :references:from:subject:in-reply-to; bh=zmekI7Kr1cwb8I9j+NSxIsDOM+Pwpr7ootORCvTDyoY=; b=BfaAOqPZZVaILYtsm7dP3rkI2MvgGAdNBe7Mgmg/KV9XgwlhFdFSIkh8MAs7o7XOnn LCV1+sCCkDmoeithrMnUHmgwHTyQ9KE3ES9D2QURvAsWEfIgQVfGxmU81PwVB4lZcyFN nJmyf+x46bu9suEU1HlIEYnkuKjehMOHzb2ZfYnmN6NNGGbwUF0raA6tj9zp/n6NHYzg or/WlgT/DJOpgdkCexiA5gWlFeuV1rvCAccl4+3wClcrLK53vwpBDDOL0SJR80UyF4G+ qgSP794yNR+Uzfw4pIeR8x61qHVWgont53isEQcYesfKEYXvW7xK++BVJ1Vp2AG458Ej 9xLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:references:from:subject:in-reply-to; bh=zmekI7Kr1cwb8I9j+NSxIsDOM+Pwpr7ootORCvTDyoY=; b=syPY0FFQmAgsWgZMUoJiKc7ztlHJHqAR2j4MsXfvi49Oqss5WWwCHZk8MMELvne+sw rOjxRTWmRW1aRNj/4+BWcRmeUVlFPuh2VpRN8DSUGdL1voZFLzcssXmATi1NGrSZ7fLi dvL5xJcURQKIdp7GflMoJ2oM0LpIzeI4xwP4Ir7aOxE+XGOP/EQq+biFmTjyUA3364Rv GFL/fB4gRnRe4x/QkWQxZ4/cjdmJXmmf3BOVWmy6ORCcN9oWUf42zUPtgeqCa5qgksdM VgpnR42eKWmmKUc6yTy0Cw8oeWW/8cHZQc7rGEB3oljAizkYLCK/zUPFMKb+TMm2YMvk XIww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/FmYVg++8BsWvJE/G8Vay7ECbDdBNigwyT1WbZERxI2ohD3cuN BI4ZsUmAfe+Q9LtqVde5uPDHtQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t83PPEwnAVaq/WVv9xnZ4Zz/BwRFBuYOjsZwC8S5if2+ey7QDyW8e0vIbfkIsGCKANxf0ENg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:ccb:b0:472:f2a2:dd73 with SMTP id 11-20020a0562140ccb00b00472f2a2dd73mr4801114qvx.0.1657740926178; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2601:5ce:300:84e:95d6:a81d:a03c:cb36? ([2601:5ce:300:84e:95d6:a81d:a03c:cb36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5-20020ac84405000000b0031bf647b115sm10266005qtn.35.2022.07.13.12.35.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b9a88e55-241f-64bc-e76a-71479ed84376@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:35:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
References: <35534782-2a1d-0585-08ae-d69475b921be@innovationslab.net> <CAMMESszdF+u1r78G9y+KgWyaKMLi-ip5B7W99jCuF20EepzXhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszdF+u1r78G9y+KgWyaKMLi-ip5B7W99jCuF20EepzXhA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------FfhI30U4SxZ0MsYZ1qDaoWxg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/2Gwz9f-7rNYqyYSblRrLtnwjFE0>
Subject: Re: [pim] Status of advancing 3376/3810 to full standard
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:35:28 -0000

HI Alvaro,

On 7/12/22 8:54 AM, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Brian:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> This would add extra scope to the bis documents, which may be interpreted
> as a significant change from the base specs.  However, given that rfc4604
> was published over 15 years ago (updating both base specs), I think it can
> be argued that this was part of the specs all along (i.e. it is not a
> significant change).

I was thinking about this perception as well. If there are concerns with 
this approach, I would consider a 4604bis.

Other thoughts??

> 
> All this is to say that we’ll want to provide strong justification — in the
> Shepherd write-up, at least.
> 

Agreed!

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email