[pim] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11

Bob Halley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 28 July 2024 20:55 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bob Halley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172220015963.1604478.18415801149457439543@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:55:59 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: CJPCRYWNGTSR2Y5RUZE27HWQJ45PQGXO
CC: draft-ietf-pim-3376bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
Reply-To: Bob Halley <rthalley@gmail.com>
Subject: [pim] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/3SAPgSWS1Y9ZBWE-5AgeOaSUquM>

Reviewer: Bob Halley
Review result: Ready

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as YES.

I did not see any issues of significance in the document.

The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements)
with the document:

6.4.2 paragraph 8 duplicates a word in the text "Section Section 6.6.3".

[pim] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-33… Bob Halley via Datatracker