Re: [pim] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-02

Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 August 2019 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920CF1200A3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 21:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ui04MkrJwjO5; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 21:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA72812004E; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 21:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id o2so37288665uae.10; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xCqNLnc2fXhCTYicE04q5KI4DFjwUb7risVMocs01q4=; b=djDq/h8J/GHZbp5Ecy58xBWofYUZSF1LcIT45Cd7Ew9NzLAUKe95rBDBV8BwCHKOBb 0kyqWwMuuDy9Fa6QD43PUOs9KnBPmKxgU3fWa7NIhVaK1rF+CKwg0a6FDee7941Z1x+m zfzcq1IUFnlUwx8Af4kXqidzZ99X1jqcxgy9ZZJgVEwZ0rX0CxZ94sEMv82iO7tFw+Ff WEl/KXK9ESpkqH3o5FwHrfwrg3gwy4smEoVLKZvCIpJePuITLxxI0eYXknuVVERFhiLK GO+ilRw5g/bcWMIkicwfA5iUR28keSljaLtueCILFQmkA4V3QZoo3zREMLfQZnsT6Jed BX9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xCqNLnc2fXhCTYicE04q5KI4DFjwUb7risVMocs01q4=; b=Kk1cjVHwpljLEMdDwJIpbtkq6ZPhoigsBUWLikRNz8Hi0y51ynthkp0Cl8vo1TKrFQ SlSoQL/OIIXEc3ALmPX3UVjsZAle+v0t4DadIWcbB/kCrwJQdvSfzIZ4pvg4CGdKodI3 SHIJB2FN2SjPh9UcQbcyFtPMlDjg7cpyQH+Ky01lhsUl95CIUUA/nPPWaXoTYVLqCtvY uHrK7XLlpEVP3B9Twn1jqUtpzUCL/+29koVRR7gY40r78tmVjJcnanC5p7EHFkM595Zq KLUsKrjIuweAtiC6X6h59RzMmw26cja54Q1EmUx0QeiQFB/zhuaQezz9+jgUQk5q67LY v8Qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWJpS1SWvdINIe4cvQkY0M/jpaLI9Cot0a9OGjGOdJNWkkPvx0Q IKYDMizim13RxscgtfjR9HS5bOP9Kb2Gvt/cMMkxwg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoNXU4gihwhhNyaho8FrFT9L+WhDa0ws1gC+J/Yf5YY6AFj1AfEUEGxX+4zDFWGHBueVxMzi2653RW3CloYzA=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:618f:: with SMTP id h15mr11321402uan.17.1565323438833; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156521737004.8428.3059445818397894106.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156521737004.8428.3059445818397894106.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:33:47 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA6qS9rAowbANxf0PtUR5KYwNewGhP1d9XWS-OyDPAzVLFYRpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike McBride via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, pim-chairs@ietf.org, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, iesg-secretary@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087c38a058fa7439d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/3m2Y2jPF52MzhZ7M2H1UPT9ZQF0>
Subject: Re: [pim] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-02
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 04:04:03 -0000

Hi Authors,
 This draft is very much needed and it gives a simple solution.
 Few suggestions/thoughts on this draft.
1. Could you please consider reserving a few types are experimental /
vendor specific usage
2. Though obvious, it might be better to mention that the order of usage
recommended is 13.0, 13.1, . . . rather than 13.0, 14.0.
3. Thought 48 types is a very big space to expand wouldn't it be better to
keep 15.x as reserved for the time being.
 Over all my suggestion is
13.0 -14.11 unassigned
14.12-14.15 experimental
15.x reserved
 4. Should this draft make a recommendation to use the reserved bits
starting from LSB rather than the present usage pattern of MSB first?

Thanks,
Anish Peter

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:06 AM Mike McBride via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Mike McBride has requested publication of draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-02
> as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PIM working group.
>
> Please verify the document's state at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits/
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>