[pim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-13: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 24 May 2019 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA85120125; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang@ietf.org, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, pim-chairs@ietf.org, stig@venaas.com, pim@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.97.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <155871943771.12273.17148916156796470545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:37:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/6GIflcoJcrPeifFVHSI5qPdVHe4>
Subject: [pim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 17:37:18 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two quick questions: 1) Not sure about the current practice about YANG models but shouldn’t this document eventually update RFC8349? 2) Also maybe it would make sense to discuss the sensitivity of explicit-tracking separately in the security consideration section?
- [pim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [pim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Benjamin Kaduk