IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pim] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp-07

Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> Thu, 26 September 2024 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96CBC1D8757; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akayla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zik7WhaURMUj; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 003CDC1D6200; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963477F40F; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.143] (server.houseofyee.com [173.8.184.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D95347F252; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:38:04 -0400 (EDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.89.24091630
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:38:01 -0700
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D2817EF3-52BA-4F30-B4C8-76B386EE8A91@akayla.com>
Thread-Topic: [pim] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp-07
References: <172731369497.191742.9419556127381676264@dt-datatracker-6c75f7dfff-hrjh6> <DM8PR11MB562206B76C2CEFBA4914611FCD6A2@DM8PR11MB5622.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR11MB562206B76C2CEFBA4914611FCD6A2@DM8PR11MB5622.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3810181085_625538584"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akayla.com; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type; s=pair-202402141610; bh=bhy8wLzYlp9XQcuXoldZ3wyIl3o2RisqYSeE0cW1uS4=; b=OcaFDsdOJ1HYiTaOSqwhaBAswzD07oLHUmb7vFrfUR+pU0wWNbuUmfKlxMKIda6nMQC9JxIq/gctwOV20kKjsTwe/sZh55zQaS2PwL+7eSSxrBwafJEjwzea1IpaEThd19U+xQoZK0m95jdpsdknxbOZ6z4rI0rxSDSwsWzzMp8sOVFMg4ULJemIzyomEJ+UmbGXA7CnJUby7GmYpG7N+ZNf1k6t4vIzpWZaC3dUgH0Vfp56X3Cz8L4oTJxZ5RnMNRZbIbgDVbgBk2C4pUmCoUgjZjrRuM3STJRkO3lx1d9NxZ2WBKaUe6en/dlSwuuIl3CFqsr4xPV5Dyzl50Ztaw==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: A7DFKITH66IOMWNNSSRIK7UZ62X2GUNZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: A7DFKITH66IOMWNNSSRIK7UZ62X2GUNZ
X-MailFrom: peter@akayla.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pim.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [pim] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp-07
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/6i6Xr4fjIPnEnnnfNKQ4RIv47b0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pim-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pim-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pim-leave@ietf.org>

Prasad,

 

My responses are below, prefixed with PEY1>

 

Thank you so much for addressing my comments.

 

                                Kind regards,

                                -Peter

 

On 9/26/24, 12:26 AM, "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com> wrote:

 

Sincere thanks to Peter for comments, please see responses below with GVP1> Most comments are fixed. Only two require some clarifications.

Thanks

Prasad

 

From: Peter Yee via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 6:51 AM
To: secdir@ietf.org <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp.all@ietf.org <draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp.all@ietf.org>; last-call@ietf.org <last-call@ietf.org>; pim@ietf.org <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: [pim] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp-07 



Page 2, section 1, 2nd paragraph, 3rd sentence: it might be better to point at
RFC 9300 for the definitions rather than RFC 6831. This is what was done on the
very next page, so rather than confusing the reader, just point to one place.
GVP1> Both RFC9300 and RFC6831 maybe needed. Can you please let us know if this is fine? 

PEY1> It’s fine by me if you feel the need to do so. I note that you point to RFC 6831 for definitions of EID and RLOC. Then you point to RFC 9300 for those same definitions (and more) a few paragraphs later. The definitions in those two documents are not identical, although they may be close enough that there’s no confusion using them interchangeably. 


Page 3, section 2.1, 2nd sentence: bracket “e.g.” in commas.
GVP1> Can you please clarify this ? I am not sure I understand what is asked for

You should end up with: …two or more flows, e.g., (root-RLOC, G-u1)…

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status