IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-drlb WGLC

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13380130DE7 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgM8HnlgQOT0 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A447D12D4EA for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 14so2567104eds.8 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FaOAw7eqjeLWipOdY5sdLtJrbhU/2fMYxvHmmiaMagM=; b=Jdh73wrs2dRiKcFN13xhhBEJQ0nCA6kxrvt3le28PTtDlILcvhv9PJ+MFktLDJSOAb TPujNKiz0gtqTBgJCka8QRtonWMt1Zx4ZkYybVdfHweimqr98vvPi72OprBk/ZW+LxIg hsBnUmtZUGp7FPNdQzsa5pZuB9ey8N2Z4rUhm4vs9nunrOYWK161L2lqfL6z0IPg0+Ml 2gtXVx6NvlB8lZNqfsflfBeZtNiOnQ0KWbmyAlpM/zepWpvlyfJxF/As8jYQdlj6xiN7 tsChAqo4FDTpBmfTHqCMRDKqQAc/WSeipo2q+6OpJ1HgXWUCgYO2FXXFAqc0i5LNC6Qd d4rA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FaOAw7eqjeLWipOdY5sdLtJrbhU/2fMYxvHmmiaMagM=; b=qEawr9TNmieuO9CV/FFeBQqwOs0G8sozc1fIrZ4gQSZzZ9HmPQ6fEoR5Vpf8bdniog gpZlI8M0O4QCFigVAqbsk+uc4891xLpAwHzt205we5LHjHZ+e2tVeLRuKWb6k3N1CxzL e9EWjr18gFinf5RZ9eqbYmyu0kvwx6xJ82Zn6uujmHbbFfuCnLxNzI+dSN0IeP53pEcP AzX03irhIVJNhSPeJI4jfCDAO2HauEJUs/qEYsBg3c6E8SxAjTFS3vlyMW2AiAJk8RSS BLgAFWN9q5i9LUVa1CsqIw46qSmRmpK6+RxJmZRkUbAcLFR+gtozvEfTnlq+KKOjekR3 lrLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJpgRNzcPCjCNt+W9hE8BGBnZsuYqAy4k2+yzXvyecxnHqzFcN5 WydMgx7ZaaKsGwaTCmghvdh+l2Pm7ZovcC/idZd2Tw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ftJaS4RsbTlcAX8cVgiVaawMxkj09Ninvfarwgv533S0yEW3cOhzDu3JeXjpE+qVcxf8mAjQONu3wSPOVqgCg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c7c9:: with SMTP id dc9-v6mr13290465ejb.232.1542142461888; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <56C839BC-817A-4E6B-BE0E-101DFF3AA251@cisco.com> <FCAD01B7-61D1-463E-B6B7-433841CD6868@akamai.com> <CAHANBt+6Y_LdQ9CLG_M4rmEd-aC9z81LH6dPH8zonWE4MxtABw@mail.gmail.com> <EDA3C260-A5D3-446A-BDD0-CD60A953351D@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDA3C260-A5D3-446A-BDD0-CD60A953351D@akamai.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:54:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHANBtJ3=H6v--HCgAuZG9quidQCCc3LbEFdZUn17McU3iWgvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
Cc: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/7t3qBde8mFCqme5zJSMUn81yXgw>
Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-drlb WGLC
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:54:26 -0000

Hi

I thought about that, but it is fairly common to write it this way and
I think the RFC Editor will understand. We will get the chance to
review it and make sure that the editor makes the right change as
well.

Stig

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:41 PM Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Stig.
>
> I support progressing the doc.
>
> -Jake
>
> PS: Maybe it's not an issue, but I also just noticed that the re-use of "TBD" in 2 places instead of "TBD1" and "TBD2" is an ambiguity that leaves room for a weird error that could be easily avoided if you're willing to make one more very minor rev.
>
> On 2018-11-13, 09:57, "Stig Venaas" <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>     I've now posted revision 10 which I believe addresses Jake's comments
>     on the IANA Considerations section.
>
>     Stig
>
>     On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:23 PM Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com> wrote:
>     >
>     > Thanks for the updates, Mankamana. After reading through it again, I think it’s in good shape.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > The only issue I see remaining is that the IANA considerations section doesn’t meet the guidelines in BCP 26:
>     >
>     > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8126#section-1.3
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > I think the checklists in section 1.3 of RFC 8126 ask for some pieces of information that weren’t provided in the draft’s IANA section:
>     >
>     > - “creating a new registry”: #1, #3, #4, #5, and #6, and
>     >
>     > - “registering into an existing registry”: #1 and #4
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > After those changes I support progressing the doc, and thanks again to the authors for their efforts in resolving all the issues.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Jake
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
>     > Date: 2018-10-22 at 21:04
>     > To: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
>     > Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-drlb WGLC
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > As a co-author I think document is ready to progress. Support progress of this document. We already have implementation for this draft.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Thanks
>     >
>     > Mankamana
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > From: pim <pim-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
>     > Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 8:25 PM
>     > To: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
>     > Subject: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-drlb WGLC
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Dear pim people,
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Today begins a two week wglc for draft-ietf-pim-drlb-09 which has addressed all comments to date, including most recently from Jake Holland. Please review the draft again and reply with your opinion on this document’s readiness to be sent to the iesg.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pim-drlb-09
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > thanks,
>     >
>     > mike
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > pim mailing list
>     > pim@ietf.org
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email