IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] pim wg adoption call for draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-06.txt

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sun, 26 June 2022 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686DDC13CD9F for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-qUzC8JYWDT for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DBFC15A721 for <pim@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id 73-20020a17090a0fcf00b001eaee69f600so6460293pjz.1 for <pim@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4prIX4HeYjf0zaqwpXc3ve3ejWB6QL2s3z5oatxXkJc=; b=gGmSIW3NU4DKN1TutfnnB4WodbuGmu5lYIqrAJwAKhDjnyvOznyJQCEDAESVNLTdFd ltBPXwFlzH99ImbLtIeFOItye61AwaF2NmejZ/jE9rB2ja5y1mOKRRuXsNLuREbAux8a 4rQGKvrrlvsUtOBpqnwwqJO5Uq43X5J68PpykGAMnKV18leJY90SB5ZHBlH6b3XnOBLI H8067dHoOfCMwuos9sEOVhBLCjibqxN5L9dXpKcGkHlrdfg7CoiCC7g9oPrKgBCpI/XB ABJImgdM/ccZUc0xvgRNciCywm9NAbVV0BdODIg5jzFVits5kfSLsyOPgFhgXImipafU rBgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4prIX4HeYjf0zaqwpXc3ve3ejWB6QL2s3z5oatxXkJc=; b=oJCR5s3vQzGo1W/O98PB8aSVlFmn/RAYOvP+iNoasiXREMZY9kkvaRym3Ge1g3kf6p O9SW70MeG6IpIy9dikkQ5Bbjxf2hWotTESH0IgxDLOhkacJo8v3VZhAcZ74+hez9RNWk h9DIVoOJrvBgRlvqMoBWtnhDrfKbbWU3o2FF5eGdrXq3EkubfWrZSZXepxApz3Iv1Qjl uwh8hxTG69d+yqooAwmYioJlE6STPEcnHNHqenzHWqezHegBxL+pEPU6vo/fO66HKUAe vCnKxxTo1ZRoEUzGmVudvXROH+7dwjcsQlupFI2c1LOjKX810i6LUjk3eqlkF+nV8wTc fdrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+gmlYwOWXgDdALlEKVUMIh8wBM4GCfX52GQCtjhsMxKoHABV6a ONmUiyP6Jz3pOu5L7MwSoInmZNKeKXcqy7qm+rfMVDy+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s935QLJmkHfVAy7pmRrFvlEuKyCeiBvhHucyfr64WYzS5qMzzr6vyrX/J7pX1DJplofo3z3SgN5JH0rfj88kA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f78c:b0:169:b76f:2685 with SMTP id q12-20020a170902f78c00b00169b76f2685mr7700129pln.41.1656221633383; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHANBtKKFBDwJ67=qZg8D_LGEiRhn5KN1oaYNWELcU15PpjH1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtKKFBDwJ67=qZg8D_LGEiRhn5KN1oaYNWELcU15PpjH1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 01:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2Ycs1V5ZiaKaDxY+bErtrTn7hSYb671UfKb7Gssu0+6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002093df05e253268a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/BO5JbKnmjAuaJXar2tofx0s3-YQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] pim wg adoption call for draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-06.txt
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 05:33:58 -0000

I support WG adoption of this draft.

I think this procedure of using TI-LFA post computation backup path
topology independently versus using LFA which is topology dependent makes
the secondary path failover work in cases where the secondary path does not
exist or due to costing is not used.

Question for authors?

Can this enhancement to MoFRR to use TI-LFA local protection for secondary
UMH be applicable to MPLS as well?

Also as TI-LFA local protection for MoFRR secondary UMH applicability to
SR-MPLS data plane as well as SRv6, could there be a possible standards
track draft in Spring for this new solution.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 5:04 PM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:

> The draft draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-06.txt was presented at our last
> meeting. We had 15 people in favor of adoption and 1 against.
>
> This starts an adoption call to see if we indeed have the needed
> support to adopt the draft. Please review and let us know by Friday
> July 8th whether you support adoption or not.
>
> Regards,
> Stig
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email