Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-10

Alvaro Retana <> Sat, 30 May 2020 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F133A097F; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSg-VU6x4Qm8; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580E03A0062; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f5so6737738wmh.2; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V65FfjbL9s03/0bkS7kwBuUCmlmfnFTkeOssKM0iUEE=; b=eHlXbKd5W4P2z3+l0w+KANePLE2YxsGIwwJ92P3tq99hZlAEvKVzpA9xcUqeRelgP9 BaODSvKyhSuPp7MiZalvq7BoI2prnM8sYw05SU89Mb1ofnAJLky81tmTprs3SRuYY/AH g1xcYyoTRlJP/Z+wzYcbHTWo4B/xMbrghz9XmPJ1Vs/t85D0tz5h6MKbleJvI7b2CJja diyP3hmRaSkzvKfs+YU0yjbSc5hF9v0mgWavHcucA0d3P9CGVGBdsz856DqSVgEU/bvG Wc3O0Pwnjs0uG8x4eVjI6V+eBH/uoaa5PqNouUY4RHWohZ5z7ytTJ6OuP2Z02QPLVP9r DFXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V65FfjbL9s03/0bkS7kwBuUCmlmfnFTkeOssKM0iUEE=; b=o6NlQA8WP4PAQVTcjfTEeQrKF7Pzv0qjP/mTVkenl7Y8g3WPbBUQYSiinhGCxPLJZg D4vYhR6P54VUwkut1AydUQ/4TDXn9leyktxb2hsce1KF1JHpQF7A4AcZJPpQkS8//xe1 6UKelfj5n333P6mm7UCfUX7rKMkF96z10MO3XRdFQl79SzLaDWCEMsCa+0TVGRzpMQhZ gPkX7L7+8VUnvSSAGDHR/surOwR9RBemnkh+hm01IYHKJdyOiHNBVnENChR4xobmn9zv oAmmZk2u8yr3PzvBHvdkBRl5FinOJI/N0svOZXEf8rpPVUDiFjG54AK64LUy78UjzmC5 1gzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/iiUBFB/zoyNDwVxIFb6zZiLxUjQHmzUTDFiEAWUy6WCylHBU BlwVfTUPAvTE8WWGDI7drSwb5S7TIXtEPHnr7UI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTTzyPaT+UItFRUo8P2t5m0wmq2+mN3gl3Lxt0AgaFU886Hl1Bcs+y6Ms9sB3mBbujhwkCogbdJ+gqJeR8qqw=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:64c1:: with SMTP id y184mr12796245wmb.175.1590839984845; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:44 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 04:59:43 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Hongji Zhao <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, Stig Venaas <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030fa5105a6dc4ce6"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-10
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 11:59:48 -0000


I have requested the IETF Last Call to start.  There are just a couple of
unused references that need to be removed:

  == Unused Reference: 'RFC4604' is defined on line 1813, but no explicit
     reference was found in the text

  == Unused Reference: 'RFC4607' is defined on line 1818, but no explicit
     reference was found in the text

You can take care of that with any other LC comments that may come in.



On May 30, 2020 at 5:15:19 AM, Hongji Zhao ( wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

We have already addressed all your comments and uploaded the latest version
as draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-11.
Thanks a lot!


-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Retana <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 5:14 AM
To: Hongji Zhao <>
Cc: Stig Venaas <>;;
Subject: RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-09

On May 2, 2020 at 8:39:48 AM, Hongji Zhao wrote:


Hi!  How are you?

> We have already addressed all your comments and uploaded the latest
> version as draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-10.

First, to answer your question about rfc4541:  Yes, it must be a Normative
reference as that is where snooping is defined.  We will take care of the
DownRef registry as we get the document approved.

I need this reference in the right place so that the IETF Last Call call
its out.

Along with that, I have some comments on -10 (see below).