[pim] Cross post since it may interest fabric/multicast people to join next weeks' discussion
Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01DF129C6A; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:04:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJ8zcd-5-RYa; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5BAD124C04; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id h50so638149ede.5; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:04:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H38RKqSHzr7s498fNgf17405H9aeYJGZJuSJ1JoHlxE=; b=KwlH7cqwAd1m743uQ3lzxd4uwy+ohaKXEXs4Nw3w1tMG5xMvxj6ibmOxY93fpPmK9h mpSV7Oab785yMkFjdMdpvluOpEYdNB3EkWuFlSpr8DmV939oUDDn/+MecTfYWHjvygzQ lMO9WSxg5MpPAvH7qTEtqQyzDtdGRCPBqu4FHA3ghb2htVqFEA3pykEjLIbQ+pUPcvrk M62IWAd8U7+YKYOn+GcErKDDY90Ic89dqjnWIPKWNctAzh6Dtr49Fj+N94J2I3IOKAxV 01mU5+Q42aNHT8wdCe+bYNzFuWWYZZdO9YxP075S/ZKINfc9WuwsSArC2lvmW8DSoAO5 s8sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H38RKqSHzr7s498fNgf17405H9aeYJGZJuSJ1JoHlxE=; b=Y6vu4W8vX2HMYYMbZT/CTIJFHv2UngaLs7DvKOhjZ6Zxu00ml3xoQzHt8la9DQiNa+ O2sbZYG45jEieKGeBsnJCnn8wQvg25OyGNzKhDhLJnQudLPU2M1M3tJYPmI4K8McsG1K joXat6DFPE8eo/CTgAVzfgHtsEeXMlux1w1QmjWURFt4TkXH3Bxk3S5idbCoIG0m1wNv S8r3LDBSf48RQpo4t/l9CLjU8kuNPwlCz/rwZ4JEbrjUrjiFGYk8/gNWdYWX+wkQuylS cw2vJzITB/KGYC86+iq30UTr9w0G7vxu7Q6ls2vsQ5GG8sgqlRQ8MDCgN6V6T0sVx0v0 rV/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuag5zrMo4ELMsjsiPQ/blCVwPyNNHgLF61P198rJ2wBWRjaRIDn DX9YH3g6SrdOmXpUPndYOb7+obyG9ucMnF7Od3AToGwN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbPIGW38bc7XjKBTGi4cRJHRJs9aKBgqKaE1b8pZs+iqmPn5ZxgLLhYVE/apxkoJdzN1Q9PM368tmddBrowJH8=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:b85d:: with SMTP id k29mr13561464ede.86.1549562646966; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:04:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:03:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hOymgnR=2aKybeAdDnw8RfNa_y+=skTJ-DXFKqUMCxWoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr@ietf.org, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000213936058151abba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/EadEjKDGHhigGWncNWNRxp4-2-w>
Subject: [pim] Cross post since it may interest fabric/multicast people to join next weeks' discussion
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 18:04:14 -0000
Cross-post to other groups given today's RIFT discussion: Despite my long resistance to introduce native multicast into RIFT based on M-OSPF scar tissue ;-) it seems it falls out almost naturally along the lines of RPL after having pushed on it today with Pascal. We would end up with a single (*,*) tree in the top of fabric and the prunning happens naturally when packets go southbound. We could even mix multicast capable and non-capable nodes easily. *Well, I encourage e'one interested in multicast, especially on fabrics to join next week discussion to influence/double-check the upcoming solution.* Today's recording: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/03bxldg5xu6zkos/AABRjx-gNba0OagXOMDftAb-a?dl=0 Multicast discussion starts late, scroll forward to 00:52:09 basically thanks -- tony
- [pim] Cross post since it may interest fabric/mul… Tony Przygienda