[pim] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11: (with COMMENT)

Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 04 August 2024 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.66] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06244C14F681; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 12:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172279902966.476131.4834827312860077125@dt-datatracker-6dd76c4557-2mkrj>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 12:17:09 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: RQLSWCPXYZUZKV6K54AZQJQRAUPZQHLC
X-Message-ID-Hash: RQLSWCPXYZUZKV6K54AZQJQRAUPZQHLC
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pim.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-pim-3376bis@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Subject: [pim] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/EzoSBvTw2UWcG0Sg4QgNioLjAGg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pim-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pim-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pim-leave@ietf.org>

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-3376bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Loganaden Velvindron for the secdir review

Security Considerations:  Both integrity (forgery) and authentication is
addressed sufficiently.  Consider adding a sentence to address the lack of
confidentiality (and privacy) protection. For example, exposure may lead to a
passive listener being able to map the network.

It is understood that it is very difficult/impossible to provide either
confidentiality protection for traffic in these protocols.