IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBE73A0EB0 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTJdcE396fyb for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7183A0EAE for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id o20so4853612pfp.11 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to:message-id; bh=a+IiPo0Sla0Bd4yxXLFeRrqDN9NBRqTIpCKUG6gtoy8=; b=OG+yxZQf41nhTK9Qh9dHq3R1IV2VLSVt6KCrhZMgAF7Tb7d23ysBJSW7+FkEjaXq/c RGEfhXrP9SG/L3YsT87vEnKD7wpO/Dfh7iD4MxJsd2UIZbB859pMCl0EZ7JEsRAg7NEl UPb375xZXld7ksBDBqShOVkZ16b7tABrEjvjBrBmKPXZmXp6NMBRB1KUpJlcF+sBsRbP fZSP+vgcBkfqz706MDhtLEIxVWHHGR7DgFjZd1k4u9U0eTIyi2SzCZwVdm72kRjBj3xe +XEw8D+GOMmlA6o84aKlkEQ1ZifjVA4GkqS2YvfqVj2W9Ok3vjURlpZMy167w01gi0ab Jubg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; bh=a+IiPo0Sla0Bd4yxXLFeRrqDN9NBRqTIpCKUG6gtoy8=; b=LK0KPA5vAmkrXBrWwxHKbLah8linZ41hN2zeRS4jA+QS44io3ZGFqvyF2hA7CeOcEp w2mojpKYUVT7dIxbt1C+hC8esm6Y4AzmRQSXDsbjOpPYS9ygZxdDtI5p4K8VrEq6SEtw ZwU6YlKCXPvp5Q2CoBc6R4Mv2ZPdz06YccB7z1J53SOPemXKNeJFtS81dhzJvKtH9wsx fa5g6h3tkWnpal7RIhX4j0TtU15q4F8snXbEzQP8xJwD78BB8TiT7aKWI7bj9/y5Zi0C pJQipXgA1sOg5XLSfQD5YlgZwv3m0eMLK6wC9zMGBt4wVTFuLOrioCNF+4Y2b+yvXjF+ I+HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OfPomZzlBWNiDcR6Ayx0mHtTAsz0KOS+ENSSblDcvC5t9ud33 jjqmClPbddxRQDaZcsCIruGwyUBP5rHHlxiVn64=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJO//JtdS2DuPv+Lq39McCzTDu86I4/osFUOP+k0AEB7vJOHxW3iTZk9Sd/sg7sN/lH46tbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1451:0:b029:13e:d13d:a058 with SMTP id 78-20020a6214510000b029013ed13da058mr4630427pfu.30.1601392875104; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host86-168-54-103.range86-168.btcentralplus.com. [86.168.54.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u27sm5064331pgm.60.2020.09.29.08.21.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B7A5BBE4-DE1D-4467-A4E9-C0F4811181A0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:21:09 +0100
References: <160139229749.18793.13022415978091035929@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: pim-chairs@ietf.org, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: pim@ietf.org
Message-Id: <508F1670-C268-45F9-8BFC-A48FE66BF02C@arista.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/HabacIO_lf9Cr7pGpiolAzSipTM>
Subject: [pim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:21:17 -0000

The PIM WG chairs asked me to summarise the findings from the IGMPv3/MLDv2 survey recently conducted into a draft in order to facilitate some discussion within the WG.

Special thanks due to volunteers that collaborated to put together the survey and to Tim Chown for posting the survey online and subsequently collating and anonymising the results.

Regards,
Femi

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> Date: 29 September 2020 at 16:11:37 GMT+1
> To: "Olufemi Komolafe" <femi@arista.com>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Olufemi Komolafe and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report
> Revision:	00
> Title:		IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Survey Report
> Document date:	2020-09-29
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		10
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report/
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   The PIM WG intends to progress IGMPv3 and MLDv2 from Proposed
>   Standards to Internet Standards.  The WG decided to conduct a survey
>   of operators, vendors and implementors of these and related protocols
>   to gather information about their implementation and deployment.
>   This document presents the results of the survey and briefly
>   summarizes the key findings.  The survey indicates that there is
>   widespread deployment and usage of of IGMPv3 and MLDv2, with numerous
>   independent implementations interoperating successfully.  No major
>   issues with either protocol were identified and, similarly, no major
>   unused features in the specifications were highlighted.  These
>   findings suggest that IGMPv3 and MLDv2 are indeed ready for
>   progression to Internet Standards.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email