[pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-10: (with COMMENT)
Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 March 2023 13:39 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ED6C137373; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, stig@venaas.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, stig@venaas.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.14.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <167897399409.27858.5333744764922141490@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:39:54 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/IBifSROTFjnEtpaouzAlTtPDg_8>
Subject: [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:39:54 -0000
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks Tommy Pauly for the TSVART review, I also agree that congestion control for PIM would be a good exercise specially when we are expecting negative impact of loss due to buffer overflow and repetitive burst of traffic. I agree with John's discuss point that it is a bit confusing to see the mix of normative and non-normative text. for example - it says. Routers may support a sufficient amount of packing to minimize the negative impacts of loss of PackedAssert packets without loss of performance of minimizing IP multicast packet duplication. According to the description preceding that line, this seems like at the level where we should normative language but it was not.
- [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft… Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on d… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on d… Zaheduzzaman Sarker