Re: [pim] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A603A3A16AC; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=YBJ+asa8; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=vmVVbp0d
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtgsxShOf27y; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A860A3A16A3; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14162; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1595320695; x=1596530295; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Hx9epFIv/2Key5d5OuIyU8LfS3nC/Qk2ykjLHNBFAE4=; b=YBJ+asa8Hf10LxbHPuMXbbjiQTBCkt4KzAnh8RsBV8aZbYO0/IEM/u0L 93hwEo+wqcu7bK0dgaVe+0URHkM1mdSNqjx9jqfkR4TFfOCavSVhqLWBQ MNRdtcnjwNHGnt2pl+EEXhlTXWdCkv5YxkobbxczY3LvRM2BlHzWwICJ6 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ARL4uVxDarwYO6DiouifzUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw30A3FWIzB4LRFhvbY9af6Vj9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH1?= =?us-ascii?q?8AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7ep3So5ngTFw?= =?us-ascii?q?nxcw1vKbe9Fovblc/i0ee09tXaaBlJgzzoZ7R0IV22oAzdu9NQj5FlL/M6yw?= =?us-ascii?q?DCpT1DfOEFyA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CxCQCBqBZf/5RdJa1gHgEBCxIMgy0?= =?us-ascii?q?vUQdvWC8sCoQpg0YDjUqKAolwhGyCUwNVCwEBAQwBAS0CBAEBhEwCF4IDAiQ?= =?us-ascii?q?4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FXAyFcQEBAQQSEQoTAQEyBQEPAgEIEQQBASQ?= =?us-ascii?q?EAwICAh8RFAkIAgQOBQgXA4MFgX5NAy4BA6E9AoE5iGF2gTKDAQEBBYUTDQu?= =?us-ascii?q?CDgmBOIJqg1WGMxqBQT+BEUOBT34+ghqCJRUfgmAzgi2SGQE8hlWLRJAPTQq?= =?us-ascii?q?CXZRzhRGfSJ8FkXsCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWojgVdwFYMkUBcCDY4eN4M6ilZ0NwI?= =?us-ascii?q?GAQcBAQMJfI4oAYEQAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,378,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="530685740"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Jul 2020 08:38:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06L8cEEx003395 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:38:14 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 03:38:14 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 04:38:13 -0400
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 03:38:12 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XWudhCYIV1JA9SywpAFGNjC20YlR4IwLI9Ch8LcCuuyqVoblox5uUtUuK7ydlXRO3o1uQYqTiE+JGfgSJhWnuiRyTPCWbdfjpmkcmI+mIf2H7eS1VbFZ9FIVej12I6xgxfKiyH+iOaO+DE+ny7cJM8bcYTu3W7vEOlTVicKxn1IowQzByloXFlJB5uisrqn/5hupjKNNLIXswjWgIjjTTOC3F7Ftjuw3ScwCz0bYYXpIBq+Jd9mzfaKV4iIfmhmKRcF+QfBqAV98HKS3XotNUMxsOB1rhd00kmudqGhcf82U3/k7Qj1VqQxtooYRZuEYQH093ErfML4REMiAqGj3CQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Hx9epFIv/2Key5d5OuIyU8LfS3nC/Qk2ykjLHNBFAE4=; b=HtqCJGQcejjlNLLEKOQwujF8k33yq3sH1oTNkHU29DDckAjLMx26U+emyzj9g/SvkeMC6+HzY4D6XzrQO7txVG7wj2mYn6v/Nar2KHyFW/tyfcFH0W/eBW8Vne5opB5SD1BWXA6KEsnYuxN4YiBMnbc3WgypYSK0XqSadOFJDhS9v1jN8sQxjhg5QKq13LhlWEl3WNt2AroJmIP0q+9bi7zpG8E4bbFh6WGCHolpJcX8enQoi6NWPn/Fj0lWfJ2moBxq+EKDIEzimU0DTtlY3MxJicTic8DTi5BDHFpZNGS4gWtJC6I8OZE4jXFoIRnBH7Kl+06C3JDugV/7b+bcjw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Hx9epFIv/2Key5d5OuIyU8LfS3nC/Qk2ykjLHNBFAE4=; b=vmVVbp0dlAJXq7fP0tiwEZmsKEi8B6XsrsqSMcswPsod5XjYrrev2fyyHHNcpJsa2Kp2HRxUhsN3IOIY2WmUpXe+b4HZpSuEQiLD8NvV9AvdNPdlFgsZlVh0T6TGjxjMcvCKlhkLCzFZk66mZZ3OByeZqIRdXB4dQ7um1INMVNk=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB4479.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:17b::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3195.24; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:38:12 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d3f:f3e:add7:dfc1]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d3f:f3e:add7:dfc1%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3195.026; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:38:12 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWVdcaKt9UCD5UUEutTLuXABV+vKkGcTkAgABSZOCAAIbZgIAKA8+AgAB6LIA=
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:38:11 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43663E3A23D01685650E5AE2B5780@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159428852777.7283.9711125025293117565@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR0701MB249249C361CB7EAE14C9E8BF96610@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR11MB435511BEE3DAF693888E91E2B5610@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxgS0QVGaQDf8P1Bo2OUoTEjQPURFMAQ4=paDab5ht1Uw@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2492D1B16BC3875EBF56350396780@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB2492D1B16BC3875EBF56350396780@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: be5218e6-e790-4231-ea91-08d82d516756
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4479:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB447982E54AC1FD1471F97269B5780@MN2PR11MB4479.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: qnhGF+Zwb6h2jkH64L31MwKZcyXXpEOZG0UlBVXjzH/HoFV9BSOjFft03BYIgVLhWsrunCV7h+4zUVCqsNPJ0jhTO6Its1iJNLPr5oFoMxuVNmxN6SWUgfm8S1LKH3laM3pu3Hvm0GD94mDXQqIM9vh+/fQwYkxI+k6nLj9f8g7k4TFLIwvVDfB7yIZSxMUM+lIrBsgge78yCg82h/LB8S8ABgmM5z/Ca3FdyX1qq+bsyVpOyBi6NrRAf9K//SFuKMieLvJiBxinchH5HUpqcFsEIWEe5JZDQg8vhY2iu3DHm4cRLu9zQBbmFFMNaIsztbZJH0NKF8SkZfWEVDnDJA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(136003)(76116006)(66946007)(8936002)(66476007)(66556008)(6506007)(53546011)(52536014)(33656002)(9326002)(71200400001)(86362001)(8676002)(66446008)(64756008)(83380400001)(5660300002)(54906003)(2906002)(316002)(9686003)(7696005)(4326008)(186003)(55016002)(26005)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: BRSwApfaLWRCtIzhpztduJNQlvuaw5RUZwJsRiZPuquiU6qqxlKUdiz1bolJgiYJ6Uy5vnR7ltjLz0VrGNXV2P+9iYPHxhdy0UpL61V3xTebohigCUvjZrHbleaB3Hw3tg+qN9ypFS00j0fdfqkBHHFqu0B2gSBT+aAXkj+5xVxILN747og+pnVIUmWnYDPM2vEPHdZE4uiKgdLB3xqwmnT4i60VliLK6EL0L1vLgGvTzrqumGwXTeIG+f5w18Dyqcf2m2ZQz7lTUUiANIJs9X4IJvYF6nugzfD2yhr8MctPhFcWdvrTld2Ss/dFWc6o7106vRRypDEZ9finrAkjNxLaqY4z1eo4lS6AceIf/016sveFuJZS3t1+gcomEBtXQqDoFseqeNkvpwgkffr60Wi+fXEonfP4oJ4JU0gh0jvOScThK2IUX2jz72wssbVuBnfmi+WYB7EAUhxh8nGCIBKwQM9Xa+5ebSoPhiPOdJQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB43663E3A23D01685650E5AE2B5780MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: be5218e6-e790-4231-ea91-08d82d516756
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jul 2020 08:38:12.1176 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: A6/rynwxiIPG+4NRGpKtFSKUgEVC3Onoti5T6sQmE7jBS7kS03vS79+F7+yd3s+SAby6hZt/sprxR7FryQg0EQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4479
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/J7c_HFu6AVTMVG_ed2jE8lVam1g>
Subject: Re: [pim] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:38:18 -0000

Hi Hongji,

That is fine.  Thank you for considering/discussing the options.  I have cleared my discuss.

Regards,
Rob


From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Hongji Zhao
Sent: 21 July 2020 02:19
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>om>; pim-chairs@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>om>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>om>; pim@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Robert,

As you summarized, each option has its pros & cons. There is no best choice.
So we plan to take the approach as Alvaro's suggestion.

Thanks a lot!

BR/Hongji

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 12:23 AM
To: Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com<mailto:hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com<mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>>
Cc: pim-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pim-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org>; Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com<mailto:stig@venaas.com>>; pim@ietf.org<mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Rob:

I understand what alternate structures may have been better.  Given the stage at which we are, my preference would be to leave the model as is.

[OTOH, if the authors want to take on the work of changing the structure… I won’t be opposed — knowing what we will basically go back to square one.]

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On July 14, 2020 at 4:57:13 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) (rwilton@cisco.com<mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>) wrote:
However, this is just a preference, and I also want to see IETF YANG models completed and standardized. I.e., I will not block progression of this document if the authors & Alvaro thinks that the existing module structure is sufficient, or choose to do (2) instead.