[pim] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-03: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-03

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below one COMMENT point (but replies would be appreciated even if
only for my own education).

Special thanks to Mike McBride for the shepherd's detailed write-up including
the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status.

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

## Section 3

Can the new header still be named "common header" when section 5 redefines it ?
Nothing critical here, more wordsmithing (and I have no proposals).