Re: [pim] Fw:Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-05

[[e-mail]]

Hi Alvaro,


I've submitted the new version that includes updates resulting from your review and comments:


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-06.txthas been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to theIETF repository.Name:           draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-caseRevision:       06Title:          The Use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multipoint Networks in Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM)Document date:  2021-08-04Group:          pimPages:          7URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-06.txtStatus:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case/Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-caseDiff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-06Abstract:   This document specifies the use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection   (BFD) for multipoint networks to provide nodes that participate in   Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) with sub-second   convergence.  An extension to the PIM Hello message used to bootstrap   point-to-multipoint BFD sessions is also defined in this document.






Looking forward to your feedback on the updates.








Regards,


Greg Mirsky






Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division

















E: [e-mail] 
www.zte.com.cn 





Original Mail



Sender: AlvaroRetana
To: gregory mirsky10211915;
CC: Mike McBride;[e-mail];
Date: 2021/08/04 10:48
Subject: Re: Fw:Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-05



Greg:


Hi!


Please upload a revision first.


Thanks!


Alvaro.


On August 3, 2021 at 9:05:08 PM, [e-mail] ([e-mail]) wrote:



Hi Alvaro,


I hope this note finds you well. The mailing list blocked the e-mail because of its excessive size. Mike, as the WG Chair, let it into the archive. Would you review the proposed changes in the working copy or prefer I upload the updated version first?