Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08

Stig Venaas <> Tue, 08 October 2019 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE89120046 for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17l_2Cr-meFB for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DD1120020 for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r16so183017edq.11 for <>; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eg0/IXnD7wl9jjKZz3QgcQ0MNnydoNLvtcBp4LhZx84=; b=RvrrlJIImR1Zz+pUCVsL+7yejSn5vyKZMLelir2Rfjo7Gq66U6nozP//nUJYknBPur MCsA3FYn+CbPdKoRCB3AEwLYivkKHYP0aPwpOI4IqucDDI/FOk2CWD2NGZtp2zTc5a7g 1a+/FUTcvsEr6DKjqYRPW8rsRJ4++QC5KFqYK75NPHs+avhUL1jt2zp6qdfPrxQmn0oi QFDknyWpaNUdPu7RL9/c8MiROmzPtsGX/g+rjrj7HCKqvCpQVXbhUpPGr5j+EgtaCNdN wY04T3ezzwzA7+dNCnJIZc9eE+MAV9woA1CWFnnG8LOphhjDRuLa6G84XtGilZiIiFDt w9YQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=eg0/IXnD7wl9jjKZz3QgcQ0MNnydoNLvtcBp4LhZx84=; b=fFhzwWKMQtI237aCMsxGXmA+e8JZAbexNFW0RjS8ECV5hZTLc/l4Ftp3NesBwMSHQ7 o0pzB3tv8/fSVeljH7V2stpmwQFbbfSxdfBJgxLEqx3CQbBf6nmh+6hbZoh6c95Q6GRt eTcO7Sxd66l6rtTm4OmSUk1KTZTEo1kGCwmcfmuRKSGUFpRj9U9q/HQ8Ula4kUR5fCZt a28N9nQU8jgAyu4Yi9w02dh6e3FK+1fbRo0HT+Lnsg06X6VZuUkdF7x9Z8NPXqyniFxB APO8rYNxVa6x81JzFTyIdJdprQCk3aZwHH7EWq+EclnwxLG2OmlzCgNl1WkA3oxZL06N QbYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJU7kAb9AN6blqnU71Xcrl9+UNWXNbI4mQuK8kv2jh93/5HgXG IGrXOhVYClNnGiUW6TISpgrZe03pKlJfICDcDJao5y2G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRf54oPqltcUxR/aUTU1fXXFxDIHqrou69rxkAYiVa5btkzYb2rjZZz+hKikX8xjMdNQ0VktlmLbBIc2ClZZI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1519:: with SMTP id f25mr225179edw.65.1570572352026; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Stig Venaas <>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:05:41 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 22:05:56 -0000


Looks that there are no concerns moving ahead with publication. Can
the authors, and any others that might know
anything about IPR, let us know if they are aware of any other IPR
claims than what has been filed already?


On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:18 AM Stig Venaas <> wrote:
> Hi
> An earlier version of this draft passed WGLC many months ago. However,
> as discussed in the WG we agreed it should have some text pointing out
> how it relates to draft-mankamana-pim-bdr-02 that we are considering
> for adoption. This text has now been added, as well as some other
> minor changes.
> Please look at revision 08 and speak up if you have any concerns.
> Authors, and others, please let us know if you are aware of any other
> IPR claims than the one that already has been filed.
> I'll wait a week or so to give people a chance to respond. We need at
> least all the authors to respond regarding IPR before proceeding
> though.
> Thanks,
> Stig