Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-12.txt> (A Yang Data Model for IGMP and MLD Snooping) to Proposed Standard

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02C83A0D78; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lroc8TKabzyJ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176423A0D6C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id g18so8340805wrm.2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x2FzfXLqJ080ygxDhZee69nwQNO5uduW1RJuImI59Ys=; b=vgvMTtWOS4rU2xpwGt/7by3kAM4Z+HHt40Mhp7q1eYCYqg+43morM17cYAiA0FKQgP KOsq2wWjPe8mqIxlHbTdz6tClHWUJ/lS01ceyVwGRfoTyXgc71QtaiLmv0LynQEJmvlh p7woflJ2RMY+9j4eHpG/7n6ps9vq7Z68VPelhPU26ckUAKj0XGu+f6XbweFxah6TPCtj 1uR0l57eQ9vXkyHlFHfXrOuARZTgKeuJTPjV44Y869DEf/I7DrdREapqcQUXen6TiIJC mX1jgZS5ZwN1wINA3ZKwf1QvZEnAwq1X8bsZc6STn0kUxErWlzX3Tcat+kK56b7siM5f cY9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=x2FzfXLqJ080ygxDhZee69nwQNO5uduW1RJuImI59Ys=; b=gLbu2NJGTki1zf865b8aBoCy6Iog+soLEM74nuuYYIjmllwFWpZq2K/H7Kb1wYuox7 YquzWOyQpmO1JdUPdsV9Rf0nYVIDbwdEVCc8UqpG3IMUh+/9fMCi1eBy+nvBncMFjb4N fXz7EnlEGWlKSVQwgh40gLwhVOsyOiwOvQVFVesoFqW3L4aSVPso9fXi7lt7uIqTdCR9 qIZVNSnauPRGOEek14vG6CcNW2fDg3KykuefI/Go+ugD9JerSxl3gFLlxrUYBrD+rJYE mr24m6LEdddBBYExKAimaQHVNhlcRgh9TV13Cp0sVQlSc2kCGmsfbYXFg5biIZc6vpic zcnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530v1qv7s69xd++KfJp2jmyveV6p6YyQLHGa9gI6tsNJSD83tsQp c99m8EZJjarmi+lMRoXuC2jIKV1UQfcTSvnMdVI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypajr0aFSH/Ai/zrh0ToOhJz7WgnMIWWWo+w7Py1hqrbCVR+IH+eKCgLK5/XYuxfUsiqe/Udr0laCQDWysnwg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5651:: with SMTP id j17mr8464509wrw.145.1592844686610; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:25 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1UWBHOe8zv.11lIAssJfau@pc8xp>
References: <159101702558.32435.15616119449036382064@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB6PR0701MB211826971407DCB2A99998D7CE830@DB6PR0701MB2118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1UWB4IgZSy.11NOwQkWKz1@pc8xp> <5EE21354.7020400@btconnect.com> <1UWBHOe8zv.11lIAssJfau@pc8xp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswRsQb7ppCu6CE+4NQwDdGiGJjZ=_50p81ekyUorzLYWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba542005a8af0d7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/TgXi0WqepdXjV9-7o6ckUKUe3bQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-12.txt> (A Yang Data Model for IGMP and MLD Snooping) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:51:48 -0000

If there are no upper case key words then we don’t need the boilerplate.

Thanks Tom!

On June 22, 2020 at 7:23:19 AM, tom petch (daedulus@btconnect.com) wrote:


And as the YANG doctor implied, there are two lower case 'should' which may
or may not call for the RFC8174 boilerplate - I have lost track of what we
are meant to do if we only have lower case.