[pim] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-10

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Stewart. Agree with both points.

Regards,
Brian

On 6/3/24 10:47 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-10
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2024-06-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2024-06-06
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:This is a well written document with just a couple of small things to
> look at.
> 
> Major issues:None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> This is a standards track document so I would expect the IANA Considerations to
> be standards track. In the IANA section the text says:
> 
>     All IGMP types described in this document are managed via
>     [I-D.ietf-pim-3228bis].
> 
> However I-D.ietf-pim-3228bis is given as an informational reference. I would
> have expected it to be a normative reference.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> The keyword (RFC2119) boilerplate use is the old version and not the modern
> version. This should be changed.
> 
>