[pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-11: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 08 August 2024 06:16 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172309780866.226.13705517838720417592@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 23:16:48 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: C222ZJBQ624EAQITLYFXRJBML7WRQXYH
CC: draft-ietf-pim-3810bis@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-11: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/WnABOAod3he_NnzDbi7VvifO0dk>

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-3810bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I reviewed the diff between this and RFC3810 only for this position.

I don't understand the SHOULD NOTs in Section 5.2.13.  What harm to
interoperability results from sending them if they are simply ignored?

[pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ie… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker