Re: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-16: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF4A3A0ACD; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80mUZ2bzYmt2; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6326C3A09E9; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id b77so3723647vsd.8; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2/kusqXYciWzrkKd2RPyd6by3SrSisWRZnIpPF6jjNg=; b=EoFKMlxIjAhF2YAsp3imrOs+9U70tL8IsW04oXz7j8q/OQGCfdADwuKd2Kh2cqk1Lx +dQG7GCrZPx4thcjGFb8QSt1ZfiXKXwdvoKg1v6eFy+x9VHEKLLceXd1JNUwSNU6scOp SuW52VilrbNQFUiUCNGd6bWSJdHQGYVHBkNt5g/YAL2qshfqXZFHBMVuFgrZUgPRzUXc AEpOIUp6xTY1SMrnOjfrwQX4G3DML/BfdbMXHNNqUwmz/dCp7aZ4nkZJNcljPLFCLEVg nBtZXdLLth5f6IGOX8LJ0Th+1H/6SlhfvNlVoShs8qTedfDP3hDCLpSLgV1DN/3HuFHw CdLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2/kusqXYciWzrkKd2RPyd6by3SrSisWRZnIpPF6jjNg=; b=toqsg1YiyOQMoFV5MHUsH2sFA2H7DqVmgCDFS8SuKDEoM+B89fs5Fbn+2Os/KqcQAr dTROAsBNHsDjlzUA92m7Uf7XA6E3V07q9u5oy8HKCBQK5VdTlv2AZUUlWxCJQQJ/aXAW 3ocBTg6s2igfyNc5DluUzmOfEaS7/llmaaNwu+YyC/cubFz/SBVoYNgi1g5/IkUoWuqX JM2EGVbFyhiNhFnl24DcVEtTEKjLUwgfCVDtuMlD8s8VNg5PIKsDZzoOlytGHe4IOeIk LrjdkfRR0u4W3qytkqL6DKWgRRdeNn6jTGAUYQCzkuY3ZY08xo1tuh8T2F2pECGHXqsn wyEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nEEzarcVFMC8VogjvJp4/z/MFj0pKqlZiWOIWhRyuWJU8ktop y7qTZoIZ7INjrH1Zz/gY0UZkJV8jD05ANf1WvHk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzB2TQzn0vHqxE2FPiH3EwdYevvhd5FIzLBFsQJjrKxVfnNb2GZqWuxk/Wv3rDEXJYyOLtA61c/ajVbKp8IKm4=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:bd09:: with SMTP id y9mr10793596vsq.13.1594415607260; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159419594277.5069.9537319405115430156@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR0701MB249231247FBECF820813389196670@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwZEyCtM99BPGkz6k2BzPWYOKN6axJCydLy70Bo31VN9Mg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB24925A670BE1A892C50FCC7796650@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB24925A670BE1A892C50FCC7796650@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:13:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa=S1=X5THQLv5Hv-j09-UeTDL2Ag8p0LAj6ZPomXrqeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e52e5e05aa1ccf3b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/Zua9GcW095Hs7EBD4EfffOKEIuw>
Subject: Re: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:13:37 -0000

The general model I'm thinking of is one where IANA actions are grouped by
registry, and each registry gets its own section.  See, for example, RFC
6376.

RFC 8407 doesn't require either way as far as I can tell, and Section 10 of
RFC 8022 makes multiple entries in a single registry so it's consistent
with what I'm proposing.

Your document's Section 6 touches two registries, hence my suggestion to
make two subsections.

-MSK


On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:54 AM Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> Please check inline, thanks.
>
> …
>
> Section 6:
>
> * I suggest this be split into two subsections, which in my experience is
> more conventional (but not required).
>
> [Authors]:  We are trying to follow the convention and template suggested
> by RFC 8407, Sec 3.8, and Sec 5.  The single section has been used by
> existing RFCs like RFC 8022. Do you think that we should use a different
> style?"
>
>
>
>
>
> BR/Hongji
>
>
>
> *From:* Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:24 PM
> *To:* Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>
> *Cc:* The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>;
> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org; pim-chairs@ietf.org;
> pim@ietf.org; Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>om>; aretana.ietf@gmail.com
> *Subject:* Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-16: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 AM Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>
> wrote:
>
> The issues founded in early YANG doctor review have been addressed. YANG
> doctor also confirmed it in the second round review on version 12 almost a
> month ago.
> Regarding other comments,  we will post a new version ASAP to address them.
>
>
>
> Whew!  Thanks for the follow-up. It would be a good idea to update the
> Shepherd Writeup in the future, because that's one of our evaluation
> resources once it gets to the IESG.
>
>
>
> -MSK
>