[pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-01
Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 May 2023 00:16 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38179C1DF995; Wed, 10 May 2023 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <168376421221.44008.5437401659842419698@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 17:16:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/_eReQ4Zxt0QorUL42nS1CI-rioA>
Subject: [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-01
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 00:16:52 -0000
Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review result: Ready Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-01 - PIM Message Type Space Extension and Reserved Bits Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review Date: 2023/05/10 IETF LC End Date: unknown Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: • No issues found. This document is clearly written and ready for publication. Nits: Section 7: Because this document obsoletes RFC 8736, IANA is asked to change all registration information that references [RFC8736] to instead reference [this document]. Should “references [RFC8736] to instead ..” be changed to “references [RFC8736] to ..”
- [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-r… Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-p… Alvaro Retana