Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-03.txt
Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2019 11:59 UTC
Return-Path: <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA5E1200C5 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ly9y1W1ZvcRU for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84E8C1200D8 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id e19so1362452vsb.12 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ClZLQuu1X735Bkf530dWBUvLXl1dnVAiPhLObRvhz2k=; b=Tc3YxQAyB0PTEaprVA1+wQZgJsmHFgjfCvUjjXhT/yBwaomNwGdmQf/XNjhCLak1Y7 51aJQOPYh/CzAUjKbaxqeTKDoSVgK2/4zKRhZEwI1XljSGsZ92EY6dOhFQxTOs5D7mDE OnSIfOvVBeLclzoeXpfkP2oT5MTe/P3gwCMnJbMH5uU+I2Bz2jm6tfqMjRDiM3H2IbJE Q2NBy03t/1vX31BpUHfIzdKpjdJFgf2oXt0djf2+QoFc9fZUwKY1lg+WBcgOE3d4x8Sf usD1dO6L4NJ6CDUd7bGb5VzG80eTNKRpWJWPo/xJXeMC8yzGK27WIcOlrJsuaEg4g9x+ B8Mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ClZLQuu1X735Bkf530dWBUvLXl1dnVAiPhLObRvhz2k=; b=Q3xBgNp0IaiRYlTcZsbaitkcUfBvRQR7U2vvZmmXo7kjzMe/3C53frFulFQBjpheNI h3bkoCayal+uN4NNO0M+YkxU51cak9DWUR5T3Xqs7Zsg5JX86IZD71yuIyxl4dCve51w 4nQHaLuOx/S6vK9aSE3abm5c5FLOipvtRzTeU5U4x/xqIJP87jQgsTU0J5PecEkAHN/d ew40EzG69V8nu/KAkPSj0DpuJnl9QBTz/wai/z2lQudy5IR8n5AA5ImWXgxvTVH0foA3 hRyx+UlubIXGePUH8bLvAgnwm1dVHm6d9XIm3tvRE/4H9ss11D5N98xoC+GuIB72q9ho V+Pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUoWi1EacbqxGUPvIK4gkKwZMfv+p7NBs65egMJnztADTIKOteo sEdUQVCZzoC0BkajehXwi+Y9S0bNoY37EM03c7CFnebQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzlFLWUf9ZffiEEmzhPbDLhbTMIR7YA7gNfJK5JjIRYJjQz5jOBCSFsoxZkfiPrixeX9vnzGQVuF6/Wi5Kt5o=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f6d4:: with SMTP id v20mr18156vso.31.1571313568434; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHANBt+uNgxa7aMrLOyhG0zseFgL42czDWYW6ke5fbc6J4viDQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBt+uNgxa7aMrLOyhG0zseFgL42czDWYW6ke5fbc6J4viDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:29:17 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA6qS9r+CbRFwupB6K4OP=4AQyu3haoBuZmqv5RdWv2ODJnB0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013cdc9059519f331"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/gVUVxqtH7aX4z0zOI5sXvCKufOQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-03.txt
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:59:31 -0000
Hi Authors, I went through the draft and have these comments. module: ietf-igmp-mld-proxy augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-protocol: +--rw igmp-proxy {feature-igmp-proxy}? +--rw interfaces +--rw interface* [interface-name] +--rw interface-name if:interface-ref +--rw version? uint8 +--rw enable? boolean AP> upstream igmp message sender source address may be an optional config entity +--ro group* [group-address] +--ro group-address inet:ipv4-address +--ro up-time? uint32 +--ro filter-mode? enumeration +--ro source* [source-address] +--ro source-address inet:ipv4-address +--ro up-time? uint32 +--ro filter-mode? enumeration AP> Do not understand the semantics of this filter-mode? Guess filter mode stated in the group level alone is relevant +--ro downstream-interface* [interface-name] +--ro interface-name if:interface-ref +--ro filter-mode? enumeration AP> I disagree with this hierarchy. IGMP is a per interface protocols and source states must be build on per interface basis. Over different downstream interfaces there are chances for different igmp versions. AP> Do not understand the semantics of this filter-mode? Guess filter mode stated in the group level alone is relevant AP> Do we have some vendor experience with this data model as proxy is mostly implemented in access/edge devices? Thanks, Anish On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:01 AM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote: > Hi > > As discussed last meeting, we are doing an adoption call for > draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-03.txt. > > Please respond by October 25th whether you think this draft should be > adopted as a WG item. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >
- [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-p… Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Hongji Zhao
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Liuyisong
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Mahesh Sivakumar
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Mani Panchanathan (mapancha)
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Sarah Wang Y
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… zhang.zheng
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Anish Peter
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Hongji Zhao
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Hongji Zhao
- Re: [pim] Adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-m… Stig Venaas