IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Hello PIM, is there any configuration wrong in PIM list ?

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Sun, 19 July 2020 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295C93A0EA6 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tH23fT0rnBtf for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2243B3A0EA5 for <pim@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id x8so7019837plm.10 for <pim@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Kvv2JxyyMyplWiFzOIv7MOtjCI4GyeSPPOKkMUTnLmw=; b=FmH7pwo1Ou5m8TVrQ6tDHNwxhlQbFq4K3L8zQiD5VViF3lFYaF6y9ot2G0mPut4ELW Sb7ylMvU8MeF30zK4JhkpvfXdcZoh8SiM+bdMoDxn5qVSa31wzy4piF87XHCd7+7gBHU cWuJSdvUhSZq7Rol7P1WNcT60Qm/mdraNJIQlpSvjvu7NR8CUM+3c7ej+/nGjeZSFKmi 2lndIdrwB6JleZE9fwbk1aqxKWZ9sy7LnrcDVtB9GV3zcJt2JPwMN5M/EzU8PuJVDJov NcNpScv/fCFVadoF8/1JfGJvRT40V9NBfL4tmFvzZ2DkbfouC9yW5KAE2sU/f6uu1FqI RxpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kvv2JxyyMyplWiFzOIv7MOtjCI4GyeSPPOKkMUTnLmw=; b=e8gd/p0B/0Wwe790Z9MfuqUHqz561+ZdOzG6HNggr/kFVH7hfWcGNihUaqySEAGx2H 5K27Bk4ReqUToGtiR6qYjvlnPp8X/fEab27JfeRk76X3ZJC2BoUP8K/Vmh86cj+4GU68 lYCAsRBsxb13jsgTROKq7g5782wYO68Mi9f0K9GiNMSkeamPLfq2G6XwOVY3kT6Ak8+i KRWS/tmTOqEBGWb2ASfA6K1emsEd5PgpncaGk7j1CW5TxjKPJv68IRyRBJRrT5rEh80F kFjLJ3EumTWenHtSF72nQ4bmaoKJc2zwEWhbua4OMu7zJYlQEKIibwljekO4mGXTx6KI Tjhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MNHWrYkiE0xGQmNfLICFx7Gpbr58wsQZetBODesxtPg9rVjms DY9WQKsCyZLjPqSaDcPVfd75C4jQ/sxJBTtrmc2dYw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzq4aojucSVIGM14B/LcQEmYq9br9xctAF8sLrExpb20gaBngJ2+wjcOb7dWD0fpJk9uBnXEkwZBnjgANJJ4So=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:800b:: with SMTP id b11mr16588934pjn.105.1595118387477; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <732604ad73d742928a56dceb24ec4f97@huawei.com> <CAHANBtLPT5gHpfZNmTBgtYJYz=+fcJ3BbiaoiZ4u3rK9NHiB8w@mail.gmail.com> <004cb75c683b4df0b306b489b06b0a7f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <004cb75c683b4df0b306b489b06b0a7f@huawei.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:26:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtLsAaS6AnROSo9cGF1gv8LR=zRRz2wQxO_2_A3n9_afeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/hovok1KZ6KW1ZwAtl4RT9g34qUQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] Hello PIM, is there any configuration wrong in PIM list ?
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:26:29 -0000

Hi

Yes, I increased this to 100K when I approved yours. We have hit the
limit a few times before. This limit has probably been the same for
more than a decade and was fine back then...

Regards,
Stig

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:54 PM Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
<xiejingrong@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stig,
>
> Thank you!
> I can see the post now in PIM list.
> To be curious, My statistics shows there are about 20% - 50% mails bigger than 40K in different WG and different time.
> So, the limit of 40K may be a little small, as the typical PIM bandwidth is increasing ;-)
>
> Thanks anyway, I will take care to cut my PIM mail short, like this one.
>
> Best Regards
> Jingrong Xie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig@venaas.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 1:10 AM
> To: Xiejingrong (Jingrong) <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
> Cc: pim@ietf.org; pim-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pim] Hello PIM, is there any configuration wrong in PIM list ?
>
> Hi
>
> Your message was too large for the configured max for pim. I approved it now, so it should be sent to the list now.
> Regards,
> Stig
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email