IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 14 July 2020 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B1B3A09E1; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bA_4o_7mL4gm; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9693A09DF; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id z2so22905766wrp.2; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ui0aGIVfdO6arZLFGZm2IKDOWeiFZ6SNnJWpUASW//M=; b=BRAzq0dELJ+bwAsVjCt4BvNeX+i5xEpl6VF0z+rgsGX/lehrsRqLXoxKe1FqyYo+C3 ptfpcdiDvbsviCeprUH/g8c1eI12y1NR/y/NRgA71CFDPpEHbEKpArBXnbdtlUv4BUxI AVz4iyR4rOrntiikLofxKBbns6dYWFr+WTpzqr5R6vNYQ7lFqhF8ZAXjKH3PGHMKIMwT dBlQtVWqC+QyouN7aT5LhyunOVkKfwXzXoupjImIUOcIehhVXS0vvBOcWsjKwMvAGO0c hLD1oBJeRLEH8tL5TV59HW4ii7qPwiPuF3sgRkY27Si+m2TLR0KnXtsuRpuSkRzRRf/d 8nag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ui0aGIVfdO6arZLFGZm2IKDOWeiFZ6SNnJWpUASW//M=; b=PNAOdciXvXkPlRqw2fq8Esac/WOGm4ui7Jz0fXEkrYjE/aOAu20L8tm2B/8XN/3ovY KFpPLWVPSp0q4KbfOkmcnMCV1UC92Hxc6qnpgqvedaUwjIOK+5X14EuLtuQPvbuOZ44B iu4Ya5+8/p1vM3w9Ohc38TrgSBLi0CFo8k484R87cmyLKSszIv6F8+mnwxkSiDMBG+JM ap0MJAfMkmlBd8LL5BQgIk+uA34I7OR3S+rv741W9a7qle7psYCQy+rqfS8lW/g+ld4H TDPI1Gf5+mUusRkM1kRrSYfpK+feVzjT5QpJLwc5jhaHmPZxCn6kKz74Clc0N78Afbhs A7cQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nFat2+t/0GJlN7KQuBZP+IP4dLlX1fcZqN6uI99396dif4TQw 9cNQehOXaVswmK+aDCr/BcZYUxxgc8zhAxhOWHc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRUlVKiD+Of9xgOjhQDk1JjjeqMw9vAY1Q33qM/yiyc86yDez1DiufEaGT36e/yk5hgWymK+DPcARw58PVAxU=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5651:: with SMTP id j17mr6504413wrw.145.1594743794570; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:13 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB435511BEE3DAF693888E91E2B5610@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159428852777.7283.9711125025293117565@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR0701MB249249C361CB7EAE14C9E8BF96610@HE1PR0701MB2492.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR11MB435511BEE3DAF693888E91E2B5610@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxgS0QVGaQDf8P1Bo2OUoTEjQPURFMAQ4=paDab5ht1Uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000062192505aa69398a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/jKPXljQtLYrAc8zDWdrZoh4k9vQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:23:18 -0000

Rob:

I understand what alternate structures may have been better.  Given the
stage at which we are, my preference would be to leave the model as is.

[OTOH, if the authors want to take on the work of changing the structure… I
won’t be opposed — knowing what we will basically go back to square one.]

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 14, 2020 at 4:57:13 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) (rwilton@cisco.com)
wrote:

However, this is just a preference, and I also want to see IETF YANG models
completed and standardized. I.e., I will not block progression of this
document if the authors & Alvaro thinks that the existing module structure
is sufficient, or choose to do (2) instead.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email