Re: [pim] WG adoption call for draft-liu-pim-assert-packing-02

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C043A11ED for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0p5LVAB4qyR for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C733A11CE for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id b23so23920795edx.4 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wCbEbP29yNMk9cdQdWtNRdASIwoBOp2qIVs8F0cgqvQ=; b=KOHH6EZ68PCRxRslKCVURTn6fN/uHG4YcYpDMY9yxJD7T6IZN7ZwBjmMLgqxUAkHOa 3fs5C1z9wQVd4bkdX+mCLUIBAh/LFLnc4UtzEuimKW5DkFrdhGb7TXEZ35Q+lXsZYlFW 2Na9onHcYKyxVGKigEYLDjN4YNOJYqUG/4PGjTiys5TM1qXKwLLZBUewlcTDExwkgCxW LM1hL8B4W2S5cn74cnADulSmnof1fTckiIxzVM2fsybpR+93vxJQ0kQx0etb7JLy+QCC +wDrRuF7Uxx+7qp/ofP0o+AwQw+pvy37kGjFJKHjVa9MKhRV+br6y1QpZKp6lYufQB0i SONg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wCbEbP29yNMk9cdQdWtNRdASIwoBOp2qIVs8F0cgqvQ=; b=dXB23EeGPkbHXWnGbY0k5zw6d51dmS5+c1QuJFLLGg0f06SbhhI9JPHStaVJ3Grk9s erTW3xTMuuAnBOpD+zCGH695DMFSaktSD/JBnHXBSgfu0oALHPiTAagPAUjQxtQDtCaH D0F4Dik/pp8aUdTLo+GrqwvxZIDvBMtxG0Ve1mb4aI2qOygxATPU2KZxdcUPw6qb1fZz x3iAm6nalTty7WTxXsH9XWMFWgyPdtulvxO8ps8Pw3Ow3pfCwPr0CDy0e2xYi7Lywo7Y GSxgDrJIeIs5rD0GudDluhV302uzMDTYxjvwV7fMqVMBGIUO/qs7Ou45thvY11XaDgKf UU9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2a19nuSFix6Ep7QVpQ3W8XcMKdtLsSArZOVdfFPKPyinlEN6J5 tLpEVuGz5J9dNCczK+aqFc+hYy4BsmYyf1yY48GDG0naGrs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuRcdV6rxxzVwZV+jz3bFtr/jUjJnZaBHAQKsqM?= =?utf-8?q?xXs+67C2iglwa+cHZzAE7CRmqwj9Erj8lEenIwfXutsxBRM=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:950e:: with SMTP id u14mr1180613ejx.287.1584395315064; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHANBtJYXf6xv+ougs_zGD0ne2Ma5yzbfWgDtQK3vgzBMYwXAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtJYXf6xv+ougs_zGD0ne2Ma5yzbfWgDtQK3vgzBMYwXAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:48:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtKp6Ai2tiXKdUz8psJSw7=rcdGUhXPQyRSK-2ZV1qBuWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/k7Eu5ByxXobcy1fE9q_6ZUFuJYE>
Subject: Re: [pim] WG adoption call for draft-liu-pim-assert-packing-02
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:48:38 -0000

Hi

There hasn't been all that many responses, but at least a couple from
non-authors, and no one against. I think we have sufficient support
for adoption.

Authors, please resubmit the draft as draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-00,

Regards,
Stig

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:20 PM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We have had this draft for PIM Assert Message Packing presented a few
> times in the WG and it is time to consider adoption.
>
> Please respond to this email by March 8th and let us know whether you
> think it is ready for adoption, or raise any concerns.
>
> Thanks,
> Stig