[pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 July 2020 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852383A17AD; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, stig@venaas.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <159405199606.29377.5546837723075647430@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 09:13:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/m3lEn5J7_zZMbcwGrUq1J1qKUEU>
Subject: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:13:24 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** It caught me by surprise for a standards track document not to use RFC2119 words in a normative way ** Section 2.2. Per “On the other hand, operational state parameters are not so widely designated as features …”, I didn’t follow the intent of this paragraph. I’m not sure what it means to designate a operational state parameter. ** Section 5. It would be worth noting that devices that use this YANG model should heed the Security Considerations in Section 6 of RFC4541. ** Section 5. Per “If unauthorized action is invoked, the IGMP and MLD Snooping group tables will be cleared unexpectedly”, could the impact of this table flush please be explicitly stated. ** Editorial -- Section 2. Editorial. s/to avoid bandwidth waste/to avoid wasting bandwidth/ -- Section 5. Editorial. The sentence “Some of the actions in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. “ appears to be included twice. It’s only needed once.
- [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Hongji Zhao