[pim] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-17: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 08 April 2020 04:13 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2743A0AB7; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, stig@venaas.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.124.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <158631921970.17162.15597011963508061200@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 21:13:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/s2UUp6OE75F6yHnh5cFAL2KHZNw>
Subject: [pim] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 04:13:40 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for the updates; they seem to address the core issues raised in my DISCUSS points.
That said, I do still have a couple additional requested changes.

With respect to authentication, I don't think we say much about how having an
authentication-type configured implies that the corresponding authentication type
is to be used at runtime (i.e., TCP-MD5 given the current state of things), and contrariwise
that the absence of a configured authentication type implies that unauthenticated TCP is used.

Also, for the leaf descriptions:

"up-time": "Indicates the duration of time since this SA entry was created in the cache. [...]"
"expire": "Indicates the duration of time until this SA entry in the cache will time out. [...]"