[pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 08 August 2024 06:03 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.52] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D95C180B5E; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 23:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.22.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172309700974.187.13432879861387926879@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 23:03:29 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: BKOLW6HWDZFMI6SQVZWEZ43YP43MMCC4
X-Message-ID-Hash: BKOLW6HWDZFMI6SQVZWEZ43YP43MMCC4
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pim.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-pim-3228bis@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/tT4VJDj17JB0lLUN6Q4fqTEZbSU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pim-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pim-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pim-leave@ietf.org>

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-3228bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Martin Dürst for his ARTART review.

I support Paul's DISCUSS position.  I'm unclear as to how changing the
registration procedure will raise the visibility and importance of the
registry, which is the solution described in Section 3.