[pim] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06

Martin Dürst via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 26 July 2024 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.81] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BE3C151535; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 02:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Martin Dürst via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172198623256.1192456.13537029610101976516@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 02:30:32 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: FCTYKGWB6PJHZOZAZUOU4QVAGBY5EUKX
X-Message-ID-Hash: FCTYKGWB6PJHZOZAZUOU4QVAGBY5EUKX
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pim.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-pim-3228bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: [pim] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/wEXfVoOiMhkJpJtRNN4HM9Vg96c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pim-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pim-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pim-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Martin Dürst
Review result: Ready

draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-06 reinstates the security section from RFC 3228, which
addresses the issue I brought up in my first review.