Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08

I agree that PIM SM DR process and failover does need improvements of which I would like to bring to everyone’s attention the BFD WG draft for PIM BFD for fast hitless convergence.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-02

Gyan Mishra
Verizon Communications 
Cell 301 502-1347

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 8, 2019, at 11:39 PM, <xu.benchong@zte.com.cn> <xu.benchong@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, Stig
> 
> I don't know any other undisclosed IPR.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Benchong Xu
> 
> 
> 
> 原始邮件
> 发件人：StigVenaas <stig@venaas.com>
> 收件人：pim@ietf.org <pim@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org <draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org>;
> 日 期 ：2019年10月09日 06:06
> 主 题 ：Re: Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08
> Hi
> 
> Looks that there are no concerns moving ahead with publication. Can
> the authors, and any others that might know
> anything about IPR, let us know if they are aware of any other IPR
> claims than what has been filed already?
> 
> Stig
> 
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:18 AM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > An earlier version of this draft passed WGLC many months ago. However,
> > as discussed in the WG we agreed it should have some text pointing out
> > how it relates to draft-mankamana-pim-bdr-02 that we are considering
> > for adoption. This text has now been added, as well as some other
> > minor changes.
> >
> > Please look at revision 08 and speak up if you have any concerns.
> >
> > Authors, and others, please let us know if you are aware of any other
> > IPR claims than the one that already has been filed.
> >
> > I'll wait a week or so to give people a chance to respond. We need at
> > least all the authors to respond regarding IPR before proceeding
> > though.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stig
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim