Re: SIP Addressing Limitations

Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au> Sat, 22 May 1993 03:17 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23164; 21 May 93 23:17 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23160; 21 May 93 23:17 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27500; 21 May 93 23:17 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA04269> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 21 May 93 23:17:09 EDT
Received: from munnari.oz.au by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA04263> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip; Fri, 21 May 93 23:17:03 EDT
Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50) id AA14055; Sat, 22 May 1993 13:16:41 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU)
To: bsimpson@morningstar.com
Cc: Paul Francis <francis@thumper.bellcore.com>, pip@thumper.bellcore.com, sip@caldera.usc.edu, tuba@lanl.gov
Subject: Re: SIP Addressing Limitations
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 May 1993 12:29:06 EDT." <1199.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 May 1993 13:16:30 +1000
Message-Id: <13651.738040590@munnari.OZ.AU>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>

    Date:        Fri, 21 May 93 12:29:06 EDT
    From:        "William Allen Simpson" <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
    Message-ID:  <1199.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>

    Since it has a private trans-continental link, and a private
    trans-oceanic link (or a very very long trans-oceanic link around the
    Cape, or a very long multi-satellite path), it will be priced far in
    excess of the costs of its competitors.

I think you don't very well understand international link
costs.   It costs me exactly the same to install a link to
the east coast of the US as it does to the west coast.
Making links that seem to be absurd is sometimes the most
rational thing to do, and can often be cost effective.

There are several links from Asian countries into US east
coast receivers.   Oten, even if perhaps not always, there
are good economic reasons for those.

Any scheme that simply assumes such things won't happen, or
allows for them only in a seriously non-optimal way is not
going to last a very long time at all.   Extreme generality
is a requirement.

kre