Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA
William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu> Fri, 21 May 1993 21:37 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15028;
21 May 93 17:37 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15024;
21 May 93 17:37 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19601;
21 May 93 17:37 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA16669> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 21 May 93 17:36:08 EDT
Received: from vela.acs.oakland.edu by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA16662> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip;
Fri, 21 May 93 17:36:07 EDT
Received: from via.ws07.merit.edu by vela.acs.oakland.edu with SMTP id AA11694
(5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4); Fri, 21 May 1993 17:33:13 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 May 93 13:01:37 EDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <1200.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
To: Eric Fleischman <ericf@atc.boeing.com>
To: pip@thumper.bellcore.com, sip@caldera.usc.edu, tuba@lanl.gov
Reply-To: bsimpson@morningstar.com
Subject: Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA
Based on the comments thus far, I respectfully request that you remove "SIP Con" #1: > 1) Since hierarchical addresses tend to be deployed in a "sparse" manner, > it unclear whether a 64 bit address space will adequately scale to meet > every conceivable future addressing scenario. Add "SIP Pro" #5: 5) SIP has a 64 bit assignment plan which is demonstrated to provide for future growth well into the next millenium, while reducing today's routing table size by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude. The plan is based on multiple well known population projections, and well understood routing algorithms, rather than theoretical extingencies. The plan provides for at least 1/4 million numbers per person (in 2025), and 6 or more layers of heirarchy. Only 3/8 of the space is reserved, leaving the remainder available for long term future expansion. Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
- PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Eric Fleischman
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA John Day
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Steve Deering
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA John Day
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA John Day
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA John Day
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Steve Deering
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Ross Callon
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Tony Whyman
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA Tony Whyman
- Re: PROs/CONs of SIP/PIP/TUBA William Allen Simpson