Re: making Noel happy......

Paul Tsuchiya <tsuchiya@thumper.bellcore.com> Tue, 02 March 1993 21:36 UTC

Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 16:10:57 EST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Tsuchiya <tsuchiya@thumper.bellcore.com>
Message-Id: <9303022110.AA01247@chiya.bellcore.com>
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, pip@thumper.bellcore.com, tsuchiya@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: making Noel happy......

>  
>      Now, (I hope), Noel won't say anymore "Pip is
>      a protocol without an architecture....."  :-)
>  
>  What Noel said (to be precise) is that X,Y,Z and PIP didn't have *routing
>  architectures*. (For my definition of this term, please refer to the Big-I
>  archives.) There's a big difference.

Sorry, I meant routing architecture when I said architecture.... :-)

>  
>  	Noel
>  
>  PS: As near as I can tell from a quick scan of sections 4 and 10, PIP now
>  has rudiments of an RA, but not one I am enthused about.
>  

I'm not surprised.  Except for adding provider selection, the
initial (near-term) Pip routing architecture is plain old vanilla
hierarchical addresses......

PX

making Noel happy...... Paul Tsuchiya
Re: making Noel happy...... Noel Chiappa
Re: making Noel happy...... Paul Tsuchiya
Re: making Noel happy...... Noel Chiappa