SIPP joint papers

William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu> Fri, 10 September 1993 15:22 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07574; 10 Sep 93 11:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07570; 10 Sep 93 11:22 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18838; 10 Sep 93 11:21 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA26841> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 10 Sep 93 11:20:58 EDT
Received: from vela.acs.oakland.edu by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA26812> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip; Fri, 10 Sep 93 11:20:56 EDT
Received: from via.dsf5.merit.edu by vela.acs.oakland.edu with SMTP id AA21939 (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4); Fri, 10 Sep 1993 11:20:27 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1993 10:24:36 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <1088.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
To: pip@thumper.bellcore.com
Cc: sip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Reply-To: bsimpson@morningstar.com
Subject: SIPP joint papers

I was working on SIP System Discovery.	Who was my counterpart in PIP?

Could the various drafters from each group to get together and agree on
joint approaches?

If we get the ball rolling, we could probably be ready for final
presentation at Houston.

Could the "principles" post a glossary (without waiting for the whole
architechture draft), so that we could update our terminology?

Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu