Re: making Noel happy......
Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> Tue, 02 March 1993 20:59 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08365;
2 Mar 93 15:59 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08361;
2 Mar 93 15:59 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21341;
2 Mar 93 15:59 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA29935> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:57:54 EST
Received: from ginger.lcs.mit.edu by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA29920> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip;
Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:57:51 EST
Received: by ginger.lcs.mit.edu
id AA07435; Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:57:51 -0500
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:57:51 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <9303022057.AA07435@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
To: pip@thumper.bellcore.com, tsuchiya@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: making Noel happy......
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu
Now, (I hope), Noel won't say anymore "Pip is
a protocol without an architecture....." :-)
What Noel said (to be precise) is that X,Y,Z and PIP didn't have *routing
architectures*. (For my definition of this term, please refer to the Big-I
archives.) There's a big difference.
Noel
PS: As near as I can tell from a quick scan of sections 4 and 10, PIP now
has rudiments of an RA, but not one I am enthused about.
- making Noel happy...... Paul Tsuchiya
- Re: making Noel happy...... Noel Chiappa
- Re: making Noel happy...... Paul Tsuchiya
- Re: making Noel happy...... Noel Chiappa