Re: SIPP joint papers
bound@zk3.dec.com Fri, 10 September 1993 16:37 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08878; 10 Sep 93 12:37 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08874; 10 Sep 93 12:37 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22319; 10 Sep 93 12:37 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06133> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 10 Sep 93 12:37:05 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06109> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip; Fri, 10 Sep 93 12:36:58 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA08452; Fri, 10 Sep 93 09:36:51 -0700
Received: by xirtlu.zk3.dec.com; id AA13256; Fri, 10 Sep 1993 12:36:46 -0400
Message-Id: <9309101636.AA13256@xirtlu.zk3.dec.com>
To: Paul Francis--formerly Tsuchiya <francis@thumper.bellcore.com>
Cc: bsimpson@morningstar.com, pip@thumper.bellcore.com, sip@sunroof.eng.sun.com, bound@zk3.dec.com
Subject: Re: SIPP joint papers
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Sep 93 12:20:11 EDT." <9309101620.AA21549@tsuchiya.bellcore.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1993 12:36:46 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bound@zk3.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp
I think it important that we talk about how PIP had figured out to use existing ARP. One of the least unknowns in SIP at the code base level is if when we define this new System Discovery scheme what is its difference and coexistence with old IPv4 systems using ARP. Many other issues too like Autoconfiguration with BOOTP, what happens to DNS, are EIDs a good idea (i think so). Some believe BOOTP is not good for system discovery and others believe it is. These kind of discussions need to take place openly and publicly A.S.A.P. and in Houston from my perspective. /jim
- SIPP joint papers William Allen Simpson
- SIPP joint papers William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIPP joint papers Paul Francis--formerly Tsuchiya
- Re: SIPP joint papers bound