Re: Sizing the Internet market
James Waldrop <jlw@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 19 January 1994 20:57 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12313; 19 Jan 94 15:57 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12309; 19 Jan 94 15:57 EST
Received: from lists.psi.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16619; 19 Jan 94 15:57 EST
Received: by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.3-PSI) id AA27723; Wed, 19 Jan 94 15:53:57 EST
Return-Path: <jlw@cs.columbia.edu>
Received: from psi.com by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.3-PSI) id AA27615; Wed, 19 Jan 94 15:53:29 EST
Received: from cs.columbia.edu by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet) id AA15973; Wed, 19 Jan 94 15:53:56 EST
Received: from shekel.cs.columbia.edu by cs.columbia.edu (5.65c/0.6/jba+ad+jtt for com-priv@psi.com) with SMTP id AA12343; Wed, 19 Jan 1994 15:53:55 -0500
Received: from localhost (jlw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shekel.cs.columbia.edu (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id PAA11997; Wed, 19 Jan 1994 15:53:53 -0500
Message-Id: <199401192053.PAA11997@shekel.cs.columbia.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: shekel.cs.columbia.edu: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: James Gleick <gleick@pipeline.com>
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
Subject: Re: Sizing the Internet market
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jan 1994 15:30:20 EST." <9401192030.AA05495@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 15:53:52 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James Waldrop <jlw@cs.columbia.edu>
James Gleick wrote: >Lloyd Brodsky asked: > >>3. To what extent is the legendarily difficult character-based >> VT100 Internet interface you get with almost all dial-up accounts >> a genuine bar to access? Put another way if, say, a Mosaic-style >> GUI interface were operable over an ordinary dial-up account how >> many more people would sign up that would not otherwise? I might >> also ask, since a SLIP connection would permit the use of Mosaic, >> if it would make a big difference why don't providers hand out >> SLIP-preconfigured copies now? > >I can tell you (self-servingly--caveat emptor) that it makes an >enormous difference. We have just begun offering a Windows >interface, and it is absolutely clear that we are drawing a >customer base for whom the interface is not just a bit of added >value. Rather, it is the difference between using the Internet >and not using it--period. Hmm, just to throw a little kindling on this fire, I would venture to say that price is more important than interface. Why? Because a place like Netcom, with a low fix-priced scheme, seems to be much more popular than the easier to use but more expensive Pipeline. I want to make it clear that I'm only operating on hearsay, as I'm not associated with Pipeline in the slightest, but I know that the general impression among those who follow the NY Internet scene is that Pipeline has been starting off slowly, mainly because of the price. I think this adds a fairly compelling twist to the discussion. James Waldrop jlw@cs.columbia.edu jlw@actlab.rtf.utexas.edu sulam@well.sf.ca.us Hejsan! sulam@mindvox.phantom.com Finger jlw@cs.columbia.edu for more information, including PGP public key.
- Re: Sizing the Internet market James Waldrop
- Re: Sizing the Internet market James Waldrop
- Re: Sizing the Internet market Clay Shirky
- Re: Sizing the Internet market Roger Bohn