[pkix] Re: [EXTERNAL] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6960 (7962)
Himanshu Sharma <himanshu@netskope.com> Wed, 29 May 2024 23:25 UTC
Return-Path: <himanshu@netskope.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222DEC1840C4 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netskope.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DjcUarXagwKQ for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-117.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-117.mimecast.com [170.10.129.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BAAC1519AC for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netskope.com; s=mimecast20210603; t=1717025146; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xD3kVD3K0plhDsWcYAvSxY+nmxVIpuopUOjqTYdr3x8=; b=A51DZ7egTB6DkQNY7deWE5AM84T83tA8MrwHTHH+Ziq6tFlVQf7e6qD1WuuO6irb/OecKj gj/edvXikO1B6LCi1aom8pQisGzA2sgqRBG2iQ+AG1IcCNSoMEiy/99ktW6KJZ1IbhVmbS G69aF0zNZf34hREBXSVEqnJBVEjv07w=
Received: from mail-oo1-f69.google.com (mail-oo1-f69.google.com [209.85.161.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-321-eljeq_aoNMKzJyKoXOlt4Q-1; Wed, 29 May 2024 19:25:42 -0400
X-MC-Unique: eljeq_aoNMKzJyKoXOlt4Q-1
Received: by mail-oo1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5b9b78fbd46so219261eaf.0 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717025142; x=1717629942; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:dkim-signature:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oeqWiBpr+mL7IA/d42b1IuHg2Z7U7S9u3yAppZ5Rqws=; b=lBOWwplQdT7D2yAn3ZPzeclpproyAcew0Mvtr3piZTJctg6BCHv9NWjT7F7e0YWYI+ +ZMBwWJQy76b6OFHhYPSeewAYqYlJ8NlhKFI6xR+UwTvSCOEAlDrVuIZ2VgzQmhhRbkB OkCksftHViwCERnRsast3vI7aguaATyRKMjTCeAxywDzvqiiYEjZSJjQzWbyd7FdEbox 5i7wzniZ/jtMRQg7flkYr56tljP15DF22kfJCXFFbVMJ72RTxdRkcYU7cYYuNLA11AEK zF9pApCr/87JtBbR/HLf7ggbbU0c6moRBZCTriK91H77wSU9wNlwCGQVr+MCffQLLn6Z el3Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUahlAXdv8KcultN8HqXP9MFafxCDCLexuBUZXaWfyO88kCqZLJExlO3MXVNtkrkSAdEvrlu+15dOwe+oaE
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuB3RhbsfZPkFbl1IFI5jP9Y91aKylDbxvXZj04DxZoV0S3lpu WRYltGA4de5zSjaoCc1/nro0Fm9FzlH6JV5gJ4ha7kyASx836uNvGvhHvzfex/ukAGtkjRcO0wY LQX2pEBEqkrh4zfQCXEYyQcJybP+HcJvDGV2FNTw2ypaXhI8sqctFBbpj+EaOOPajmUudEOOhDO bPK1NPgdpZXc8zWAagWQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:893:b0:24f:e5f2:1cf0 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25060b6ec46mr849537fac.14.1717025141929; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRlpjAEBP8HKnoPhJDNM7V33QTvnQ5hsi2smd9AZI9nDzStjdny54g3CDRnlb+mgxgQ+adgOAI2GEE
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:893:b0:24f:e5f2:1cf0 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25060b6ec46mr849528fac.14.1717025141659; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netskope.com (relay.goskope.com. [163.116.131.203]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 586e51a60fabf-24ca1f6fb80sm884211fac.16.2024.05.29.16.25.41 for <pkix@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: netskope.com
Received: by mail-pl1-f199.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6174cfcf8so3123655ad.3 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW6+/vyDuB8LHl6ch28JAZydaNhogvWK7T9AxIO0xU4dye2O7hGcvPlY7neR/K0rS4fJSTYlF10jNoAEovk
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2306:b0:1f6:fa0:da71 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6194f91ebmr5443035ad.18.1717025140344; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2306:b0:1f6:fa0:da71 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6194f91ebmr5442825ad.18.1717025139832; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240529010227.F01687FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240529010227.F01687FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
From: Himanshu Sharma <himanshu@netskope.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL9pJ7=nG-urBxziJvvh4-EYv210x5omYGqib7=4yShkYRK5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
x-netskope-inspected: true
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: netskope.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087d6bf0619a011c1"
Message-ID-Hash: WIUSZNDNXRDDYLJY4GZTAALIOARUBJXL
X-Message-ID-Hash: WIUSZNDNXRDDYLJY4GZTAALIOARUBJXL
X-MailFrom: himanshu@netskope.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pkix.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: sts@aaa-sec.com, mmyers@fastq.com, ambarish@gmail.com, slava.galperin@gmail.com, cadams@eecs.uottawa.ca, paul.wouters@aiven.io, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com, pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [pkix] Re: [EXTERNAL] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6960 (7962)
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/0nlcotJfnz3le4AGEVeryUsOHnY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pkix-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pkix-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pkix-leave@ietf.org>
Hi All During the OPSDIR review of my draft, Susane Hares pointed out the unnecessary import of "ATTRIBUTE" in section Appendix A.2, that I had fixed in the subsequent draft update. During the discussion It was mentioned that it would be helpful and a good idea to file an errata for RFC-6960 Section B.2 as the same unused import of "ATTRIBUTE" exists there too. I would kindly request the members here to verify this errata. -Himanshu On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:02 PM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6960, > "X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status > Protocol - OCSP". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7962 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: himanshu sharma <himanshu@netskope.com> > > Section: B.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > IMPORTS > > Extensions{}, EXTENSION, ATTRIBUTE > > Corrected Text > -------------- > IMPORTS > > Extensions{}, EXTENSION > > Notes > ----- > It should not include "ATTRIBUTE" as it is not being used anywhere. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6960 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-20) > -------------------------------------- > Title : X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online > Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP > Publication Date : June 2013 > Author(s) : S. Santesson, M. Myers, R. Ankney, A. Malpani, S. > Galperin, C. Adams > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6960 (7962) RFC Errata System
- [pkix] Re: [EXTERNAL] [Technical Errata Reported]… Himanshu Sharma