Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381)

["Peter Yee" <[e-mail]>]

This seems to be junk or a joke.  The term "Void Elements" appears nowhere
in RFC 6818, and even if it did, the original text and the corrected text
are the same.  The notes make no sense.

			-Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:09 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6818, "Updates to the
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate
Revocation List (CRL) Profile".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6818&eid=4381

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Gerard Barlow <[e-mail]>

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------
Void Elements

Corrected Text
--------------
Void Elements

Notes
-----
Slow the out of control data rate.  slim the file system.  enhance
performance

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
"Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the
status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6818 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5280-clarifications-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Updates to the Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
Publication Date    : January 2013
Author(s)           : P. Yee
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG