[pkix] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6844 (5065)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 22 August 2017 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1A613213F; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxQJKZjk24Kg; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E36E132026; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 59981B8106A; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: philliph@comodo.com, philliph@comodo.com, rob.stradling@comodo.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ekr@rtfm.com, iesg@ietf.org, pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20170822165748.59981B8106A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/6vQlqAEg86kTkInk58Vtb3vGAng>
Subject: [pkix] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6844 (5065)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:58:18 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6844, "DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Phillip Hallam-Baker <philliph@comodo.com>
Date Reported: 2017-07-10
Held by: EKR (IESG)

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
   Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to performing a CAA
   record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label immediately above
   X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a CNAME or DNAME
   alias record specified at the label X.

   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise

   o  If A(X) is not null, and R(A(X)) is not empty, then R(X) =
      R(A(X)), otherwise

   o  If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)), otherwise

   o  R(X) is empty.

Corrected Text
--------------
   Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to performing a CAA
   record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label immediately above
   X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a CNAME or DNAME
   alias record chain specified at the label X.
 
   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise
 
   o  If A(X) is not null, and CAA(A(X)) is not empty, then R(X) =
      CAA(A(X)), otherwise
 
   o  If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)), otherwise
 
   o  R(X) is empty.
 
  Thus, when a search at node X returns a CNAME record, the CA will
  follow the CNAME record chain to its target. If the target label 
  contains a CAA record, it is returned.

  ?O?therwise, the CA continues the search at
  the parent of node X.
 
  Note that the search does not include the parent of a target of a
  CNAME record (except when the CNAME points back to its own path).
 
  To prevent resource exhaustion attacks, CAs SHOULD limit the length of
  CNAME chains that are accepted. However CAs MUST process CNAME
  chains that contain 8 or fewer CNAME records.

Notes
-----
This is the updated errata to replace the ones previously deleted. It has been reviewed by all the parties concerned. Since this is a breaking change, this will have to go to hold for document update. The LAMPS working group is currently considering a more radical re-working of the CAA discovery scheme as a work item for its new charter.

I will be in Prague to discuss...

--------------------------------------
RFC6844 (draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
Publication Date    : January 2013
Author(s)           : P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG