Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3280 (4972)

RFC 3280 is obsoleted by RFC 5280.  This is correct in RFC 5280, so the error has already been fixed.

Russ

> On Mar 17, 2017, at 7:40 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3280,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3280&eid=4972
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
> 
> Section: 4.2.1.5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   id-ce-certificatePolicies OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  { id-ce 32 }
> 
>   anyPolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce-certificate-policies 0 }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   id-ce-certificatePolicies OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  { id-ce 32 }
> 
>   anyPolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce-certificatePolicies 0 }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The ASN.1 did not compile due to a missing identifier.  The corrected text does also occur in A.2.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3280 (draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
> Publication Date    : April 2002
> Author(s)           : R. Housley, W. Polk, W. Ford, D. Solo
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix