Re: [pkix] Redundant signature algorithm info in certs.

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5957D12D6EE for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_HOME=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0DBQ1LafeOhd for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A81D12D0CD for <pkix@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:37571 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1b5x0F-000Adl-OE for pkix@ietf.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:15:15 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
To: pkix@ietf.org
References: <000701d1b5bd$267b0d60$73712820$@x500.eu> <CA+i=0E5M3XOKqtn+OVAJEMir4ThqMgYVXc6RX5VmQpMaUgzQkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57471305.30907@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:15:17 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+i=0E5M3XOKqtn+OVAJEMir4ThqMgYVXc6RX5VmQpMaUgzQkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/RhWq-XvcZbIQxaF7Tm0ucWJ3Csc>
Subject: Re: [pkix] Redundant signature algorithm info in certs.
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:15:18 -0000

Erwann is right. The use of a signature "macro" enables consistent
processing of sigs irrespective of whether a specific data object also
includes sig algorithm info internally.

Steve