[pkix] X.509 client certificates on Web - Deprecated by Google

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Thu, 03 September 2015 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E311B325E for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wy4jPm55ymQ9 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76A01B303F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibz8 with SMTP id z8so85301727wib.1 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gtMJZ/iHscRKEL1xXw27PrTK/BMgQOoFerilszxI/e4=; b=rXBayplPgLc+z5rm3uUvH5MDQQjnFt0yotrN7FH+9+JHgD/6Hxr+k4pBp+7KycegeE q/euh5E1CKcb6R65uyW+DrTqtyPgbB2tCQYrN0NvdaKbe+0u2ImaVSR0fqHp0/n/wGQc CgSnZ7WDc4dKWMN3CBoOU1kcZ8mNzJrxU1/Xr7zwrbGNos2uYgbAfSZGHpXBTcpWpj6c UEYqZfg5ez4QXMjggHpOilZHr2wBhMCEWgOPJXJdBmsLwcdkX0M8FpHh1cTAopkxcYYK /eGFbJy23bz06G3CadexMEaZAFgZIXPljqR4p+89uO4zc4EM+boo6Bq8F5YFrq83s3ut +7Ag==
X-Received: by 10.180.104.68 with SMTP id gc4mr10768682wib.67.1441255230481; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (240.196.130.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.130.196.240]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ul1sm35646805wjc.30.2015.09.02.21.40.29 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55E7CF30.9000006@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:40:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/U7wRLZCedbG9nOBbpwX-hPtF3qE>
Subject: [pkix] X.509 client certificates on Web - Deprecated by Google
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 04:40:33 -0000

https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/pX5NbX0Xack/discussion

"While a use case exists for provisioning TLS client certificates for authentication, such a use case is inherently user-hostile for usability, and represents an authentication scheme that does not work well for the web. An alternative means for addressing this use case is to employ the work of the FIDO Alliance [12], which has strong positive signals from Microsoft and Google (both in the WG), is already supported via extensions in Chrome [13], with Mozilla evaluating support via similar means [14]. This offers a more meaningful way to offer strong, non-phishable authentication, in a manner that is more privacy preserving, offers a better user experience, better standards support, and more robust security capabilities"

W3C.org spokesmen are now speaking the same language:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2015Sep/0011.html

"There have been several high-profile attacks on client certificates (see
for example "Triple Hand-shake" [1]) that make client certificates a not
suitable for authentication systems. X.509 is also problematic to parse,
leading to security issues [2]. While FIDO is not perfect (the privacy
community needs to look at the channel ID work too), its definitely best of
breed right now and I think will solve your use-case over the course of the
next year"

-- Anders