[pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5480 (6670)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 31 August 2021 21:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61FA3A0755 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vl5lgMOypeyz for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AD83A077F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DA639F4072C; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: turners@ieca.com, kelviny@microsoft.com, dbrown@certicom.com, housley@vigilsec.com, wpolk@nist.gov, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: corey.bonnell@digicert.com, pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210831213731.DA639F4072C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/WIYS555aR2DG3_Mo-h7p39gcDC0>
Subject: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5480 (6670)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:38:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5480, "Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6670 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Corey Bonnell <corey.bonnell@digicert.com> Section: 3 Original Text ------------- If the keyUsage extension is present in a certificate that indicates id-ecDH or id-ecMQV in SubjectPublicKeyInfo, then the following values MUST NOT be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyTransport; keyCertSign; and cRLSign. Corrected Text -------------- If the keyUsage extension is present in a certificate that indicates id-ecDH or id-ecMQV in SubjectPublicKeyInfo, then the following values MUST NOT be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyEncipherment; keyCertSign; and cRLSign. Notes ----- "keyTransport" KU bit name does not exist; I believe "keyEncipherment" is intended here instead. While RFC 8813 makes it clear that "keyEncipherment" and "dataEncipherment" are prohibited, I'm marking this erratum as "Technical" due the reference to a non-existent bit name. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5480 (draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Publication Date : March 2009 Author(s) : S. Turner, D. Brown, K. Yiu, R. Housley, T. Polk Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5480 (6670) RFC Errata System