Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sat, 25 December 2021 04:16 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D15A3A0CA3 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:16:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntOAfmv-X-Rq for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EA93A0C9F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1BP4FtIF030726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Dec 2021 23:16:01 -0500
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:15:55 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>, tb@openbsd.org
Message-ID: <20211225041555.GH11486@mit.edu>
References: <20211221184313.8407B12108F@rfc-editor.org> <FD62FC2A-2939-4E6D-A623-24CEAB11EC23@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FD62FC2A-2939-4E6D-A623-24CEAB11EC23@vigilsec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/aYZymrZ97vxTUS-3NesD2yBrB1c>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 04:16:21 -0000
Thanks, Russ. I also worked through the changes and they make sense, so I marked it as Verified. Thanks to Theo for the report! -Ben On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:59:08AM -0500, Russ Housley wrote: > This looks correct to me. I think it should be approved. > > Russ > > > > On Dec 21, 2021, at 1:43 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3779, > > "X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6792 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Theo Buehler <tb@openbsd.org> > > > > Section: Appendix B > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > 30 3d Extension { > > 06 08 2b06010505070107 extnID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.7 > > 01 01 ff critical > > 04 2e extnValue { > > 30 2c IPAddrBlocks { > > 30 10 IPAddressFamily { > > 04 03 0001 01 addressFamily: IPv4 Unicast > > IPAddressChoice > > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 02 00 0a addressPrefix 10/8 > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 03 04 b010 addressPrefix 172.16/12 > > } -- addressesOrRanges > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > 30 07 IPAddressFamily { > > 04 03 0001 02 addressFamily: IPv4 Multicast > > IPAddressChoice > > 05 00 inherit from issuer > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > 30 0f IPAddressFamily { > > 04 02 0002 addressFamily: IPv6 > > IPAddressChoice > > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 07 00 200100000002 addressPrefix 2001:0:2/47 > > } -- addressesOrRanges > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > } -- IPAddrBlocks > > } -- extnValue > > } -- Extension > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > 30 3d Extension { > > 06 08 2b06010505070107 extnID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.7 > > 01 01 ff critical > > 04 2e extnValue { > > 30 2c IPAddrBlocks { > > 30 10 IPAddressFamily { > > 04 03 0001 01 addressFamily: IPv4 Unicast > > IPAddressChoice > > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 02 00 0a addressPrefix 10/8 > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 03 04 ac10 addressPrefix 172.16/12 > > } -- addressesOrRanges > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > 30 07 IPAddressFamily { > > 04 03 0001 02 addressFamily: IPv4 Multicast > > IPAddressChoice > > 05 00 inherit from issuer > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > 30 0f IPAddressFamily { > > 04 02 0002 addressFamily: IPv6 > > IPAddressChoice > > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > > IPAddressOrRange > > 03 07 00 200100000002 addressPrefix 2001:0:2/48 > > } -- addressesOrRanges > > } -- IPAddressFamily > > } -- IPAddrBlocks > > } -- extnValue > > } -- Extension > > > > Notes > > ----- > > b010 represents 176.16/12, the hex representation of 172 is ac, so it should be ac10. > > > > The IPv6 addressPrefix in question is 2001:0:2/48, not 2001:0:2/47, as explained in the text before the example. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC3779 (draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn-03) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers > > Publication Date : June 2004 > > Author(s) : C. Lynn, S. Kent, K. Seo > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > > Area : Security > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pkix mailing list > > pkix@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix >
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6… Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6… Benjamin Kaduk