Re: [pkix] CMP/EST versus FIDO Alliance

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 03:24 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA13812009C for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iqa00YhE_P_x for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10543126579 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 7so113159095wmo.1 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r2AIDm/wmmR6pjNnUEhHhmZZ25+mf3oyymqywlSjkXo=; b=OOmeDRTmZGxOzUKQbCls83YFE/8UPk0n6Itxki05Q2E0v5AErN5CKc6zlD41efJ8mK LBR7a8q1+ZxH+2YXdvfyPRs+8HM3EeHlJOPxaObla1LKihisGVzdbQflfZNGF+h/Zm0R s4fvAg1i/gAphea+VrALWAAZYfAOkRtysYwzcN6805nTwHZOIDFwR341/kq1ZXcfo+sU ty7uA1cfhIIkxFplVqSaf1m7XWRSRbUcZ5lkIXt78GdbwxKefWWFYF+qSMbw4ywzt30V DhI2f4rmxkO2kJV6H/P7YsW8SdxHDcnKYrv+dxut64P1Ne+b+f7GwnQcGdicwPFis0fr eAhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r2AIDm/wmmR6pjNnUEhHhmZZ25+mf3oyymqywlSjkXo=; b=NnjPg7JUkDWHyk6guaqHaJ0lbhUh0z7IfftlH7e1+n9uSxDcHq6B+lXZe3boD1QlfM H+oHMqv4tl/IGNhT4f0FhSMLJezFHSD4gyi9ViZJNjXxNQMgrtpp3FgUHzrHzXdwn+SZ 0aJO1L2m9+w+sMYtcAG8I8vSYNOfWc5d8lXr0oNdMZELHOSdBjguRhqz1ThJChshooMB s0LDHk6FF92VTTg0iumkSLN50/WRtJhBQwJVpsDQYOxUG5/w0iYrXlTrB6RDFFC5C7Cl 0msFQBWLLb1GxB7Ukb0Pgbzzn0CFT5P1xKi16b3JTNSSKXrcZCaGWfWVyWFMSyoriFSF gijg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCdTYeHyGZw6ZBnyACDVCAGHxlzVCEGnIuyBRCabP15F5Llyrql Q4oMARD9vH1ORZ8t
X-Received: by 10.28.66.23 with SMTP id p23mr406527wma.38.1495769069392; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (124.25.176.95.rev.sfr.net. [95.176.25.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm13086126wrb.68.2017.05.25.20.24.27 for <pkix@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 May 2017 20:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>
References: <84a84dc2-432c-b5c2-6d94-58c2ff1f00f7@gmail.com>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2e4c2261-d4c1-c6e0-f78a-71859925294a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 05:24:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <84a84dc2-432c-b5c2-6d94-58c2ff1f00f7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/c_yKb9-uOBHMFwxg44ZISgM1zNM>
Subject: Re: [pkix] CMP/EST versus FIDO Alliance
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 03:24:33 -0000

On 2017-05-25 09:51, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> In FIDO alliance products key container attestations is a mandatory feature, while in PKIX related enrollment standards it is still a largely unknown concept:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg33122.html
>
> Anders

I forgot to mention that deployment of a "second factor" is also a mandatory part of FIDO alliance products, while entirely absent in PKIX counterparts:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg28990.html

Now the browser vendors have removed support for enrollment of client-side PKI which is quite logical given the inferior state of this technology.

Anders