Re: [pkix] Optimizing OCSP - Time for some spec work ?

"Todd E. Johnson" <tejohnson@yahoo.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tejohnson@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419B81200A1 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, REPTO_QUOTE_YAHOO=0.646, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KGFQ_COjBZYg for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic309-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic309-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD41120096 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1571970373; bh=pqCmcgd0DycE7R6z4qFHw25MqmvtnymA4ftjuk1VQS0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=NfObDJM+6GU0HAw42Z66OE/1knp1IbK1jTqo/lzuEQcBbzcbRVGQ6hINTUAb8mfyB34tiopHcuASRL4G2lmFBL+VQHk1ID+TIMm6Rr8XODmyp8ymfXtuF4EX0mY99CnoUfBYbPk1sKg1HOv2k3Cl+x7je5LkaCElM0ME9Dgc6ux6gvzehFFTvPZEvWPvgwa6/5zbGGl5LS6QIJhSy27DSaOURdkGWfizdIUgGQdgA0QLizg+JjP1QuLSG2XOAs0SWX45TmIHhrr/BBpZv+EPS/PRXTuHip86ElHwUnAjj/DI5MEGVM3TJNjFYEpE4kz9FeAJTlZApQlsNyeDD2GRNw==
X-YMail-OSG: MRB5eD8VM1mjJG297LKBY5kL0lN..RAyATARQzLTrwZHWrEycuklONOhtX.IsKf Cm4167uPJ0xjMsPGD0_zwIGTrj1DCG9Pv86cseYJPmwH0cjoBTw8DSLoPy2AFO23Lc8r_HKW1RhC STNlhnPIlf1T2iFG3hDFs0UbxUfZUWOIG3d2.LKah95XgXWiiwpWQ_n6NmerUAIqtttDUsEYmqvj sQxs5N9.XTSZtbLktxJ7GcG58n6cPIhwu499.gd9h2HlNATAziaqBahDAZYt8ETpF3ivXxc0EI._ TXWAU1UsDl19.N5rf_CJfmFgpDeI7782AC7axQDKXsWDyC5m8fYJo5ixo5OZsohN0Eea9vtQZmy9 8feLJjrjbeeHz.5rRej1Sh9Z0tNi6JAsCd6vVuWGUrTDanITaLcFSc3E_2Z2UgdUrmI2mf_bY1Rl 3LTx44icZ7HprKunrazExwcjWmPQ0iFeqt6H3MLMfOHfy0Xzl5CunjjmdM5_C3PqwSuLvJjM4OK7 szoiO8QPksyCoCQXqFRh7KW5Kd7AUmOC0fItXAr_GZJdjGZ0QmYmDNdeePzWMBWFwoeC88leZnPW eUX_H9vC8gEew59YhlNDhtBIoYEsNCwU_ea2tGJJa.tGYVSmO25XWngIV1D1aHoN8lc3RCCss0i. mm.yHhC8uLb1MVQ4BTR6OSvF_eAURTVW_C.CrKuRunwOBv92PJtJ3Em3R23uDv_plFv0JGKouybG bVeElgcza2v23ejgKTrtweRW06p6DKhCW3a_z8bWR8Vacu.afROpfpGjcm4z_VeNEOiigNn_MoTF qpk_FNmyUxseZsXUXf3q3liqA.g1ughbmHKmlkD6OOGnpYsBp4l2x8PofB0MqeRycOYDB07wTqT_ JKzI0A3B01y5Oc4iwluSlFHSefs.gPL.zT.YS9Z9Wx5Iq6Zg_83K01.vwHafLawARBBfxFBIq3qX liLm4erLsQlsbktmmKvGgpqDH3g2EaR8NlZvr75k86S0zZTCtdVLWOwKxvJMwctpO9815QGXe1Nq BPFv3VPfugbjWzJwmqh9ehx54KWzsR9FsY4y.6GMEap5y8Beara62BkaUOMwBmsGg5Vj4yLc8sX8 eFy4gWCF6181Fd1XiyC0xSMrf11GeskpA.TFR3J9lcyO3i7GBe_GUFs5ketbDW4N.GUC3n0i0u.n Wtc6HdYP1TqDEnfCC3QVtQe0g1KccMW_5K8uqIcjmFSpIQim7ncFtaivkRFUaPUOmWE0TjRNvPsN Qf6J3g_h2MuM275QgcdPZHvS80axc75yuJ7WUiegS9v2E1mFbfJ6eyWFbNeRFF2Axf0jFSfa2K.L 883eLJ8ii8hW1HHxAeBB1pCE3Y2GkXeMd81Tmt.C69w--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:26:13 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Todd E. Johnson" <tejohnson@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: "tejohnson@yahoo.com" <tejohnson@yahoo.com>
To: "pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz" <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "denis.ietf@free.fr" <denis.ietf@free.fr>, "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <904857450.453994.1571970371478@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1571970028478.36845@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <31256d2d-dcfb-85f7-3850-accb2b2d6b89@openca.org> <a0c0ef7c-7415-e078-a49d-d0908c6c898c@free.fr> <1178303845.438310.1571969542913@mail.yahoo.com> <1571970028478.36845@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_453993_910918584.1571970371476"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.14593 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.0.13; Android/10; QP1A.191005.007; blueline; Google; Pixel 3; 5.19; 2028x1080; )
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/i-XGPYMRAymYzDS__74jLbvS2Tc>
Subject: Re: [pkix] Optimizing OCSP - Time for some spec work ?
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:26:16 -0000

Oh,
You mean the following?
https://github.com/GSA/ficam-scvp-testing/tree/master/utilities/vss2

Otherwise, I tried to document other implementations at the time:
https://github.com/grandamp/SCVPAPI/blob/master/README.md



 
 
  On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 22:20, Peter Gutmann<pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>; wrote:   Todd E. Johnson <tejohnson=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; writes:

>FWIW, RFC 5055 implementations are quite rare

"Quite rare" is being generous :-).  Some portion of the USG played with one
years ago, I think they had some Java code done by a government contractor,
and AFAIK that's it.  I got the impression at the time that it was more a 
means of getting vendor lock-in than anything else, i.e. using a protocol
that nothing else implemented ensured you got the contract because there was
no alternative

I'm not sure if Denis was being deliberately disingeneous with the 5055 
reference...

Peter.