Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)
Jaime Hablutzel <hablutzel1@gmail.com> Tue, 28 May 2019 22:27 UTC
Return-Path: <hablutzel1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA73120018 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q_QOOk5zKUzo for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941411200F6 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id f8so281900wrt.1 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/f5CyG+sYmjw01+1vtkbu1c56XA+/J+aE68nFlldV7U=; b=TuY35h2V3+F/2piRz/zGfieJ+qf5xxHTA9tIr4h6kdyt0voP7Cx3MZTsJtZBLaFCp1 R/16e179RrpJlLHni2cxJKZhDCqDrov0K1lmmlgSXsHkMHr1r7tj2vKy3XbQbgJEBvsQ mqm+qDXSFqOOOjGjzIE7Ea84flCKB/XGqreJqFLr72unucJKpIvvBXgi9zncx9vRvrGE sf5Gs9GMiUjPDGmuhaV3/D+8LIiPKIpKqG/kROfq8X0K6Ew/rLCR4p1IYoHpEMHNDVy3 BNwNF7kfkPlR9wZMHyGCo3NsLl0BdB9dZYS14QFLdDPIpITfkhiN2CmKk3JnBfeOcAFL GQpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/f5CyG+sYmjw01+1vtkbu1c56XA+/J+aE68nFlldV7U=; b=j3KBP2qZNt3IcfI1vqk1pali9FzIq52z62lCe/9akwarYSi2YulBQflgShf37Wcpm+ ooQ6+LFEyR3PVVZzgj5pKjmYT1dJiKXWaIj6PvSoV9eGQ4CFu6WFHsiaKo4NfGiU5OY9 Uo9ZoG5YxStRhmtjwjZ29yP6hDi2lBFCr7G3Syz2tJGTjrnRdSOeOEeGweYjCe2TLcAS LprJFvsB55eWW5IhNQxRq2sk4cdM0FRLk6cq8TJgh4fUzAybbef8T17j1QoHmSGKmUZz T6ZHoCcaiz7rFx5ORWm6IxVQOyLjETNjxvgYKTEhRgeV6jLh3t52A67BROENKedOnAy7 uMKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpXefSVanZ+rvsiRDakImW9fNAcjtSgL9roNiklxbomT2MbXcB F3PH7yezXDyDKd7chc2IOBWHLfEVYSUUB0kxpVY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzy8akbDU76m2QbAvVK5FaCyZkANm1uzMmp7E+eg8OHd1r9Isy+e5rqNJwDH7g0eVzicHrbcUDWNfyR1oVo1ao=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd45:: with SMTP id h5mr16692395wrs.128.1559082468897; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190526031152.147B8B82CD0@rfc-editor.org> <73AA806C-F623-4EDB-9F5B-180EA2DE5E16@vigilsec.com> <35A8007A-E49F-479C-8300-6BA04F04A9E8@sn3rd.com> <MEXPR01MB093414F05EB4514DB7C6FE47E51E0@MEXPR01MB0934.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MEXPR01MB093414F05EB4514DB7C6FE47E51E0@MEXPR01MB0934.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jaime Hablutzel <hablutzel1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:27:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFxNpv8oRhycNmO5qtuHCtJRxf9gVRryVmV0u_P7UW-KQvD5SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bbf98c0589fa2c1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/qzRBAts8Rm--6_AnDm6f1WOnj-E>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 22:27:53 -0000
Quoting from https://www.ietf.org/blog/iesg-processing-rfc-errata-ietf-stream/: 5. Typographical errors which would not cause any confusions to > implementation or deployments should be Hold for Document Update. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:25 PM Manger, James < James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote: > -1 > Reject (& delete) to discourage errata for such trivial typos. > Now RFC5019 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5019) gets a red line at the > top saying "Errata Exist", encouraging us to waste time reading a pointless > errata page. > > -- > James Manger > +61 4 1754 1870 > > -----Original Message----- > From: pkix <pkix-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Turner > Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2019 12:58 PM > To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> > Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>; Benjamin > Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> > Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740) > > +1 > > > On May 26, 2019, at 12:38, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > > > I do not think an implementer will be confused here. So, I suggest > "hold for future update". > > > > Russ > > > > > >> On May 25, 2019, at 11:11 PM, RFC Errata System < > rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5019, "The > >> Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for > High-Volume Environments". > >> > >> -------------------------------------- > >> You may review the report below and at: > >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5740 > >> > >> -------------------------------------- > >> Type: Editorial > >> Reported by: Jaime Hablutzel <hablutzel1@gmail.com> > >> > >> Section: 2.2.1 > >> > >> Original Text > >> ------------- > >> In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to > >> an OCSP request containing a option not supported by the server, it > >> SHOULD return the most complete response it can. > >> > >> > >> Corrected Text > >> -------------- > >> In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to > >> an OCSP request containing an option not supported by the server, it > >> SHOULD return the most complete response it can. > >> > >> Notes > >> ----- > >> "a option" should be "an option" > >> > >> Instructions: > >> ------------- > >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. > >> When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change > >> the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >> > >> -------------------------------------- > >> RFC5019 (draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-11) > >> -------------------------------------- > >> Title : The Lightweight Online Certificate Status > Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments > >> Publication Date : September 2007 > >> Author(s) : A. Deacon, R. Hurst > >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > >> Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > >> Area : Security > >> Stream : IETF > >> Verifying Party : IESG > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pkix mailing list > >> pkix@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pkix mailing list > > pkix@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > -- Jaime Hablutzel - RPC 994690880
- [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Sean Turner
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Manger, James
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Jaime Hablutzel