[pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC6402 (6571)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 May 2022 00:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9718EC159A26; Mon, 9 May 2022 17:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BI2yjBgPScPk; Mon, 9 May 2022 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB6BC1594BF; Mon, 9 May 2022 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id A9E2011FD74; Mon, 9 May 2022 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, jimsch@augustcellars.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, pkix@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220510001707.A9E2011FD74@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 17:17:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/rxh9N4d1RoJ7jeOHUWbgQJNiU54>
Subject: [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC6402 (6571)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 00:17:11 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6402, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6571 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date Reported: 2021-05-04 Verified by: Roman Danyliw (IESG) Section: Appendix A.1 Original Text ------------- pendInfo PendInfo, extendedFailInfo SEQUENCE { Corrected Text -------------- pendInfo PendInfo, extendedFailInfo [1] SEQUENCE { Notes ----- The ASN.1 module will not compile properly without a tag on one of these elements. The ASN.1 module in Appendix A.2 has a tag in this spot. -------------------------------------- RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates Publication Date : November 2011 Author(s) : J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC6402 (6571) RFC Errata System